Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy In Children: A Case Report with Literature Review
Published on: March 27, 2026
Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices in children
Ramesh Srinivasan1, Tracey Irvine, A M Dalzell
1Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK. ramsriniv@doctors.org.uk
Insights
Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) devices in children is a safe and cost-effective alternative to endoscopic removal. This method avoids the need for endoscope disinfection and disposable equipment, saving approximately £90 per procedure.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
- Medical Device Management
Background:
- Limited published data exists on non-endoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) devices in pediatric patients.
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are common in pediatric care for nutritional support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of traction removal for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) devices in children.
- To describe the outcomes and complications associated with traction removal of PEG devices at a single pediatric center.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data collection over a 5-year period (2002-2006) from endoscopy records and hospital information systems.
- Analysis of 220 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) removals, with a focus on 166 cases performed via traction.
- Corflo 12-Fr percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes with collapsible retention domes were utilized for traction removal under general anesthesia.
Main Results:
- Traction removal was performed in 166 out of 220 (75%) percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) device removals.
- Complications were infrequent, including internal retention dome separation (2 cases) and one instance each of enterocutaneous fistula and suspected device misplacement requiring laparoscopy.
- Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) devices resulted in cost savings of approximately £90 per procedure by avoiding endoscope disinfection and disposable use.
Conclusions:
- Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in children is a generally safe procedure with no associated mortality.
- The technique is cost-saving, offering a financially advantageous alternative to endoscopic removal.
- Traction removal represents a viable and efficient method for managing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) devices in the pediatric population.
Background:
There are few published data on non-endoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices in children.
Aims:
To describe prospective data acquired for traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices at a single pediatric center over a 5-year period.
Methods:
Data were obtained from endoscopy records, computerized hospital patient information systems and case note analysis. The device that could be removed by traction was the Corflo (Merck) 12-Fr percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with a collapsible internal retention dome. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia.
Results:
Between 2002-2006, 220 children underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy removals (166 by traction, 51 endoscopically and 3 Foley catheter to button conversions). The median duration between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion and low profile button device substitution was 0.83 years (0.12-3.86). Complications from traction removal included internal retention dome separation in two cases (allowed to pass per rectum, uneventfully), failure to a insert a low profile button device needing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy reinsertion, enterocutaneous fistula requiring surgical closure in one patient and laparoscopy for suspected low profile button device misplacement in one instance. The material cost of endoscope disinfection (£10) and disposable usage (£80) avoided by traction removal was calculated at £90 per procedure.
Conclusion:
No mortality occurred as a result of the traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Laparoscopy for suspected low profile button device misplacement was needed in one case (0.60%). Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes was generally safe and a cost-saving procedure in our experience.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...