Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future
Tim J F ten Cate1, Johannes C Kelder, Herbert W M Plokker
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. timtencate@yahoo.com
Insights
Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) is valuable for patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing. Patients with perfusion defects beyond abnormal activation related defects (AARD) have a worse cardiac prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) value is debated in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing.
- Abnormal activation related defects (AARD) on MPS may not indicate poor prognosis.
- Assessing prognostic value of MPS in LBBB or RVA pacing patients is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic significance of myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing.
- To differentiate prognosis based on the extent of perfusion defects in these patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of vasodilator stress MPS in patients with LBBB or RVA pacing (April 2002 - January 2006).
- Group 1: Normal MPS or MPS with only AARD. Group 2: MPS with perfusion defects extending beyond AARD.
- Primary outcomes: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization.
Main Results:
- Group 2 (96 patients) had significantly worse prognosis (49% survival) than Group 1 (101 patients, 91% survival).
- Annual cardiac death rate was 6.4% in Group 2 vs. 0.7% in Group 1 (P < .001).
- Prognosis did not differ between LBBB and RVA pacing patients.
Conclusions:
- Patients with perfusion defects extending beyond AARD (Group 2) face significantly worse cardiac outcomes.
- Low annual cardiac death rate (<1%) in Group 1 suggests a watchful waiting approach.
- High cardiac death rate in Group 2 necessitates aggressive invasive strategies.
Background:
The value of myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) for patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing seems reduced. The prognosis of patients with only abnormal activation related perfusion defects (AARD) due to LBBB or RVA-pacing is similar to those with a normal MPS. We assessed the prognostic value of MPS in patients with LBBB or RVA pacing.
Methods:
Patients with LBBB or RVA pacing referred for vasodilator stress MPS between April 2002 and January 2006 were analyzed. Group 1 are patients with normal MPS and MPS with AARD. Group 2 are patients with an MPS with a perfusion defect extending outside the AARD area. Events were cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization.
Results:
In Group 1 (101 patients) 12 events and in Group 2 (96 patients) 45 events occurred during a mean follow-up of 2.6 +/- 1.5 years. The prognosis of Group 2 was significantly worse (49%) compared with Group 1 (91%). The annual cardiac death rate was 0.7%/year in Group 1 and 6.4%/year in Group 2 (P < .001). The prognosis of patients with LBBB was not different from those with RVA pacing.
Conclusion:
Group 2 had a significantly worse cardiac prognosis compared to Group 1. The annual cardiac death rate of <1% in Group 1 warrants a watchful waiting strategy, whereas the cardiac death rate in Group 2 warrants aggressive invasive coronary strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias