Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual acuity.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same author

Visual Field Testing on the Envision Head-Mounted Perimeter with and without Gaming Elements.

Ophthalmology. Glaucoma·2026
Same author

Registration-Based Analysis of the Three-Dimensional Shape of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer for Detection of Glaucomatous Defects.

Translational vision science & technology·2026
Same author

Targeted perimetry for mapping the shape of glaucomatous arcuate scotomata.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

Predicting perimetric defects from en face maps of retinal nerve fibre layer reflectance.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2024
Same author

Structure-function assessment in glaucoma based on perimetric sensitivity and en face optical coherence tomography images of retinal nerve fiber bundles.

Scientific reports·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Differential vertical visual latency as determined with a simultaneity paradigm.

Shephali Patel1, Steven H Schwartz, William H Swanson

  • 1State College of Optometry, State University of New York, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.

Vision Research
|December 26, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to measure visual field processing speed without motor responses. The superior visual field shows slightly faster visual processing compared to the inferior visual field.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Physiology

Background:

  • Behavioral, anatomical, and physiological data suggest functional differences between the superior and inferior visual fields.
  • Previous latency studies relied on motor reaction times, limiting applicability in elderly or motor-impaired populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel simultaneity paradigm for assessing visual field processing latency.
  • To determine relative visual processing speeds between the superior and inferior visual fields, independent of motor responses.

Main Methods:

  • A simultaneity paradigm was developed to measure visual processing latency.
  • This method avoids reliance on motor reaction times, making it suitable for diverse populations.

Main Results:

  • A statistically significant, albeit small, shorter latency (3.9+/-5.9ms) was observed for the superior visual field compared to the inferior visual field.
  • The observed latency difference was not influenced by participant age.
  • The simultaneity paradigm demonstrated low within- and between-session variability.

Conclusions:

  • The novel simultaneity paradigm effectively measures visual field latency without motor involvement.
  • The superior visual field exhibits a slightly faster processing speed than the inferior visual field.
  • This method offers a reliable tool for visual perception research, especially in clinical and aging populations.