Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Risk prediction is improved by adding markers of subclinical organ damage to SCORE
Thomas Sehestedt1, Jørgen Jeppesen, Tine W Hansen
1Department of Internal Medicine, The Cardiovascular Research Unit, Glostrup University Hospital, Nordre Ringvej, Glostrup, Denmark. ts@heart.dk
Insights
Subclinical vascular damage independently predicts cardiovascular death, enhancing the Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) for better risk stratification in healthy individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Preventive Cardiology
- Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Risk
Background:
- The Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) is widely used for cardiovascular risk stratification.
- The incremental value of subclinical vascular damage in refining risk prediction for healthy individuals remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if subclinical vascular damage significantly improves cardiovascular risk prediction beyond the established SCORE system in a general population.
Main Methods:
- A population-based cohort of 1968 healthy subjects (aged 41-71) without prior cardiovascular disease or diabetes was assessed.
- Measurements included traditional risk factors, left ventricular mass index, carotid plaques, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR).
- Subjects were followed for a median of 12.8 years for cardiovascular mortality.
Main Results:
- Subclinical organ damage, including left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid plaques, elevated UACR, and increased PWV, independently predicted cardiovascular death.
- Incorporating subclinical organ damage into risk prediction models demonstrated potential to improve specificity or sensitivity depending on the strategy.
- Broadening primary prevention to include individuals with lower SCORE (1-5%) and subclinical damage significantly increased sensitivity for identifying those at risk.
Conclusions:
- Subclinical vascular damage is a significant independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality.
- Combining assessments of subclinical organ damage with the SCORE system offers a promising approach to enhance cardiovascular risk stratification and optimize primary prevention strategies.
Aims:
It is unclear whether subclinical vascular damage adds significantly to Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk stratification in healthy subjects.
Methods And Results:
In a population-based sample of 1968 subjects without cardiovascular disease or diabetes not receiving any cardiovascular, anti-diabetic, or lipid-lowering treatment, aged 41, 51, 61, or 71 years, we measured traditional cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular (LV) mass index, atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries, carotid/femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) and followed them for a median of 12.8 years. Eighty-one subjects died because of cardiovascular causes. Risk of cardiovascular death was independently of SCORE associated with LV hypertrophy [hazard ratio (HR) 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-4.0)], plaques [HR 2.5 (1.6-4.0)], UACR > or = 90th percentile [HR 3.3 (1.8-5.9)], PWV > 12 m/s [HR 1.9 (1.1-3.3) for SCORE > or = 5% and 7.3 (3.2-16.1) for SCORE < 5%]. Restricting primary prevention to subjects with SCORE > or = 5% as well as subclinical organ damage, increased specificity of risk prediction from 75 to 81% (P < 0.002), but reduced sensitivity from 72 to 65% (P = 0.4). Broaden primary prevention from subjects with SCORE > or = 5% to include subjects with 1% < or = SCORE < 5% together with subclinical organ damage increased sensitivity from 72 to 89% (P = 0.006), but reduced specificity from 75 to 57% (P < 0.002) and positive predictive value from 11 to 8% (P = 0.07).
Conclusion:
Subclinical organ damage predicted cardiovascular death independently of SCORE and the combination may improve risk prediction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Relative Risk
z Scores and Unusual Values
This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...

