Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management

Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management

The nursing management of a patient with peripheral artery disease (PAD) begins with a thorough assessment of the patient’s health history and clinical manifestations.AssessmentHealth History: Evaluate the patient’s history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history of cardiovascular issues, and lifestyle factors such as dietary patterns, smoking, and physical activity.Physical Examination:Assess the affected extremity for decreased or absent peripheral pulses, temperature changes,...

Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound

Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound

To obtain accurate blood pressure measurements in clinical settings, especially when traditional methods are insufficient, healthcare professionals utilize the Doppler ultrasound technique. This method uses high-frequency sound waves to detect blood flow within the arteries, which is crucial for patients with conditions that complicate circulatory system assessment.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the patient.

Assessment of apical radial pulse

Assessment of apical radial pulse

Apical-Radial (A-R) Pulse Assessment
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Intrapartum Care for Women with Multiple Sclerosis: A JBI-Guided Scoping Review and Evidence Synthesis of Clinical Practices and Maternal Outcomes.

International journal of women's health·2026

Same author

Colorectal liver metastases: imaging strategies for diagnosis, local treatment planning and systemic treatment response.

European journal of radiology·2026

Same author

T2 bright, clinically dim: pheochromocytoma with malignant potential and an atypical clinical presentation.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2025

Same author

CT and MRI Characterization of a Retroperitoneal Lymphatic Malformation in an Adult.

Cureus·2025

Same author

Prevalence and Predictors of Stress Among Medical Students in Jordan: A Multi-centric Cross-sectional Study.

Medical science educator·2025

Same author

Design and synthesis of 3-(azepan-1-ylsulfonyl)-<i>N</i>-aryl benzamide derivatives as potent carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors with anticancer activities.

Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Mouse Model of Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury

Mouse Model of Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: March 9, 2019

Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work?

Denis Anthony¹, Panos Papanikolaou, Sam Parboteeah

¹Mary Seacole Research Centre, De Montfort University, Leicester LE2 1RQ, UK. danthony@talktalk.net

Journal of Tissue Viability

|December 29, 2009

Summary

Pressure ulcer risk assessment scales may not be effective in clinical practice. While reliable for research, their components often lack predictive power, and clinical judgment may be equally effective.

More Related Videos

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home

Published on: March 1, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Mouse Model of Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury

Mouse Model of Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: March 9, 2019

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home

Published on: March 1, 2024

Area of Science:

Clinical Nursing
Patient Safety
Healthcare Research

Background:

Risk assessment scales are standard tools for predicting pressure ulcer development in clinical settings.
Existing validation studies primarily focus on the predictive accuracy of these scales.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the validity and clinical utility of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.
To identify limitations in current scales and explore alternative predictors of pressure ulcer risk.

Main Methods:

Review of existing validation studies on pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.
Re-analysis of previously collected data to conduct additional validity tests.
Literature review to identify other relevant clinical variables.

Main Results:

Many components within current risk assessment scales lack predictive power for pressure ulcers.
Additional clinical variables not included in scales offer enhanced predictive capability.
Scale component importance is not accurately reflected by assigned values, and components are often correlated, allowing for simplification.
No conclusive evidence demonstrates that implementing risk assessment scales reduces pressure ulcer incidence.

Conclusions:

Current pressure ulcer risk assessment scales may be overly complex for routine clinical practice.
Clinical judgment appears as effective as scales in assessing pressure ulcer risk.
The observed reduction in pressure ulcer incidence post-implementation of scales may be attributed to the Hawthorne effect, not the scales themselves.
Risk assessment scales are valuable research instruments but their clinical utility is questionable.