Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Bias and precision in true-score estimation.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Recognize the Value of the Sum Score, Psychometrics' Greatest Accomplishment.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Proof of Reliability Convergence to 1 at Rate of Spearman-Brown Formula for Random Test Forms and Irrespective of Item Pool Dimensionality.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Reliability Theory for Measurements with Variable Test Length, Illustrated with ERN and Pe Collected in the Flanker Task.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Rejoinder to McNeish and Mislevy: What Does Psychological Measurement Require?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

On dimensional implication graphs.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Reliability Beyond Theory and Into Practice.

Klaas Sijtsma1

  • 1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Psychometrika
|December 29, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study addresses critiques of Cronbach's alpha, a key measure in psychometric research. It discusses how this important statistical knowledge is shared with researchers who use it in their studies.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Psychology
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Cronbach's alpha is a widely used reliability coefficient in psychological research.
  • Recent critiques have raised questions about its interpretation and application.
  • Understanding these critiques is crucial for accurate psychometric analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address and synthesize the critical reactions to Sijtsma's (2009) paper on Cronbach's alpha.
  • To examine the dissemination of psychometric knowledge among substantive researchers.
  • To foster a clearer understanding of reliability estimation in psychological science.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of critical commentaries.
  • Analysis of the arguments presented by Bentler (2009), Green and Yang (2009a, 2009b), and Revelle and Zinbarg (2009).
  • Discussion of knowledge transfer and educational practices in psychometrics.

Main Results:

  • The paper consolidates various perspectives on the limitations and appropriate use of Cronbach's alpha.
  • It highlights ongoing debates regarding the interpretation of internal consistency reliability.
  • The study identifies challenges in the effective dissemination of complex psychometric concepts.

Conclusions:

  • Cronbach's alpha requires careful interpretation and is not a universal measure of reliability.
  • Effective communication of psychometric principles is essential for advancing research quality.
  • Further efforts are needed to improve the understanding and application of reliability measures among researchers.