Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System
Published on: May 9, 2021
On the shape of surface nanobubbles
Bram M Borkent1, Sissi de Beer, Frieder Mugele
1Physics of Fluids, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217,7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Surface nanobubble contact angles are constant down to 20 nm, challenging previous findings. This study reveals a reproducible 119° angle on smooth surfaces, independent of cantilever type.
Area of Science:
- Surface science
- Nanotechnology
- Physical chemistry
Background:
- Previous atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies suggested anomalously large contact angles for surface nanobubbles, often around 160°.
- A potential dependence of contact angle on nanobubble size (theta(R)) was also hypothesized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To accurately determine the contact angle (theta) of surface nanobubbles as a function of their radius (R).
- To investigate the influence of substrate smoothness and cantilever properties on nanobubble contact angles.
- To clarify the set-point dependence in AFM measurements of nanobubbles.
Main Methods:
- Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was employed to image and measure surface nanobubbles.
- Experiments were conducted on smooth, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) substrates.
- A variety of different AFM cantilevers were utilized to assess reproducibility and identify potential artifacts.
Main Results:
- A constant contact angle of 119 ± 4° was measured for nanobubbles down to a radius of 20 nm on smooth HOPG.
- This observed contact angle is the lowest reported for surface nanobubbles and is reproducible.
- Surface roughness induced by cantilever debris led to larger apparent contact angles (~150°).
- Nanobubble shape and measured contact angle showed dependence on AFM set-point ratio below ~95% and cantilever properties.
Conclusions:
- The contact angle of surface nanobubbles on smooth HOPG is size-independent down to 20 nm.
- Clean cantilevers and smooth substrates are crucial for accurate nanobubble characterization.
- AFM measurement parameters, particularly the set-point ratio, significantly influence nanobubble morphology and apparent contact angles.
More Related Videos
08:31Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope (AFM-SECM)
Published on: February 10, 2021
07:10Production of Membrane-Filtered Phase-Shift Decafluorobutane Nanodroplets from Preformed Microbubbles
Published on: March 23, 2021