Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Use of Artificial Sputum Medium to Test Antibiotic Efficacy Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Conditions More Relevant to the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: June 5, 2012
Clinical pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Jared L Crandon1, Catharine C Bulik, Joseph L Kuti
1Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
Abstract:
We evaluated cefepime exposures in patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa to identify the pharmacodynamic relationship predictive of microbiological response. Patients with non-urinary tract P. aeruginosa infections and treated with cefepime were included. Free cefepime exposures were estimated by using a validated population pharmacokinetic model. P. aeruginosa MICs were determined by Etest and pharmacodynamic indices (the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC of the infecting organism [fT > MIC], the ratio of the minimum concentration of free drug to the MIC [fC(min)/MIC], and the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve for free drug to the MIC [fAUC/MIC]) were calculated for each patient. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to partition the pharmacodynamic parameters for prediction of the microbiological response. Monte Carlo simulation was utilized to determine the optimal dosing regimens needed to achieve the pharmacodynamic target. Fifty-six patients with pneumonia (66.1%), skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) (25%), and bacteremia (8.9%) were included. Twenty-four (42.9%) patients failed cefepime therapy. The MICs ranged from 0.75 to 96 microg/ml, resulting in median fT > MIC, fC(m)(in)/MIC, and fAUC/MIC exposures of 100% (range, 0.8 to 100%), 4.3 (range, 0.1 to 27.3), and 206.2 (range, 4.2 to 1,028.7), respectively. Microbiological failure was associated with an fT > MIC of < or =60% (77.8% failed cefepime therapy when fT > MIC was < or =60%, whereas 36.2% failed cefepime therapy when fT > MIC was >60%; P = 0.013). A similar fT > MIC target of < or =63.9% (P = 0.009) was identified when skin and skin structure infections were excluded. While controlling for the SSSI source (odds ratio [OR], 0.18 [95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 1.19]; P = 0.07) and combination therapy (OR, 2.15 [95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 7.88]; P = 0.25), patients with fT > MIC values of < or =60% were 8.1 times (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 55.6 times) more likely to experience a poor microbiological response. Cefepime doses of at least 2 g every 8 h are required to achieve this target against CLSI-defined susceptible P. aeruginosa organisms in patients with normal renal function. In patients with non-urinary tract infections caused by P. aeruginosa, achievement of cefepime exposures of >60% fT > MIC will minimize the possibility of a poor microbiological response.
Insights
Achieving cefepime exposures above 60% of the dosing interval where free drug concentration exceeds the MIC (fT > MIC) is crucial for treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Doses of 2g every 8 hours are recommended for optimal cefepime therapy.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Background:
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a significant pathogen in non-urinary tract infections.
- Cefepime is a commonly used antibiotic for P. aeruginosa infections.
- Understanding cefepime pharmacodynamics is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship predictive of microbiological response to cefepime in patients with P. aeruginosa infections.
- To determine optimal cefepime dosing regimens to achieve target PD exposures.
Main Methods:
- Population pharmacokinetic modeling was used to estimate free cefepime exposures.
- Pharmacodynamic indices, including fT > MIC, fC(min)/MIC, and fAUC/MIC, were calculated.
- Classification and regression tree analysis identified predictive PD parameters; Monte Carlo simulations determined optimal dosing.
Main Results:
- Microbiological failure was significantly associated with fT > MIC values of ≤60% (P=0.013).
- Patients with fT > MIC ≤60% were 8.1 times more likely to experience a poor microbiological response.
- A target fT > MIC of ≤63.9% was identified, even when excluding skin and skin structure infections.
Conclusions:
- Achieving cefepime exposures >60% fT > MIC is critical for minimizing microbiological failure in non-urinary tract P. aeruginosa infections.
- Cefepime doses of at least 2 g every 8 hours are required to achieve this target in patients with normal renal function.
- Optimized cefepime dosing based on PD targets can improve treatment efficacy against P. aeruginosa.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
