Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Exploring the research decision space: the expected value of information for sequential research designs
Susan Griffin1, Nicky J Welton, Karl Claxton
1Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom. scg3@york.ac.uk
Sequential Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information (EVPPI) analysis expands research decision-making. This method assesses sequential research designs, offering new insights beyond single-parameter evaluations for greater research efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Decision Analysis
- Health Economics
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Expected value of information (EVI) analysis quantifies the expected gain from further research.
- Expected value of perfect information (EVPI) guides research by identifying key parameters.
- Traditional EVPPI focuses on single parameters, potentially missing sequential research benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI) and its application to research decisions.
- To examine the role of conditional and sequential EVPPI in EVI analysis.
- To broaden the scope of research decisions addressed by EVI.
Main Methods:
- Demonstrated calculation of EVPPI for single, grouped, conditional, and sequential parameters.
- Defined conditional EVPPI as information value dependent on prior information.
- Defined sequential EVPPI for multi-stage research designs.
Main Results:
- Conditional EVPPI differs from individual EVPPI.
- Sequential EVPPI incorporates joint and sequential parameter information.
- Sequential designs allow for research abandonment based on interim findings.
Conclusions:
- Incorporating sequential EVPPI enhances EVI analyses.
- Sequential EVPPI allows for the assessment of sequential research designs.
- This approach widens the research decision space in EVI.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Experimental Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Determination of Expected Frequency
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
