Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Regression Analysis01:11

Regression Analysis

Regression analysis is a statistical tool that describes a mathematical relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A General Framework for Designing and Evaluating Active-Controlled Trials with Non-Inferiority Objectives.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Correlates of severe and delta COVID-19 in a phase 3 trial of the AZD1222 vaccine.

NPJ vaccines·2026
Same author

Profiling of SARS-CoV-2 virus shedding, antibody neutralization, and T-cell receptor repertoires in a large, multi-center cohort of young adults with varied prior exposures.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Comparing HIV Vaccine Immunogenicity Across Trials With Different Populations and Study Designs.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Reflections on FDA Draft Guidance on Bayesian Methods in Trials-Protecting Scientific Integrity and Evidentiary Standards.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 acquisition on binding and neutralizing antibody responses following COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-protocol analysis of individual-level data from six phase 3 clinical trials.

Vaccine·2026
Same journal

Calculations involving the multivariate normal and multivariate t distributions with and without truncation.

The Stata journal·2024
Same journal

Cluster randomized controlled trial analysis at the cluster level: The clan command.

The Stata journal·2023
Same journal

Power and sample-size calculations for trials that compare slopes over time: Introducing the slopepower command.

The Stata journal·2023
Same journal

artbin: Extended sample size for randomized trials with binary outcomes.

The Stata journal·2023
Same journal

artcat: Sample-size calculation for an ordered categorical outcome.

The Stata journal·2023
Same journal

power swgee: GEE-based power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

The Stata journal·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Accommodating Covariates in ROC Analysis.

Holly Janes1, Gary Longton, Margaret Pepe

  • 1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

The Stata Journal
|January 5, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces three methods for incorporating covariate information into receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to improve classification accuracy. These methods enhance diagnostic test evaluation by accounting for various factors influencing marker performance.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Informatics
  • Diagnostic Accuracy Research

Background:

  • Classification accuracy is key for diagnostic tests, often using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
  • Covariates (variables) frequently influence marker observations and discrimination ability.
  • Standard ROC analysis may not fully capture complex covariate effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present three novel methods for integrating covariate information into ROC analysis.
  • To enhance the evaluation of diagnostic markers by accounting for confounding factors.
  • To quantify the incremental value of markers when combined with covariates.

Main Methods:

  • Covariate adjustment for factors affecting marker observations in controls.
  • Modeling ROC curves as a function of covariates affecting discrimination.
  • Assessing the incremental discriminatory value of adding a marker to covariates.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated methods for covariate adjustment in ROC analysis.
  • Developed techniques for modeling ROC curves with covariates.
  • Quantified the improvement in discriminatory accuracy when markers are added to covariates.

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating covariates significantly refines ROC analysis for classification accuracy.
  • The proposed methods provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating diagnostic markers.
  • Understanding covariate influence is crucial for accurate diagnostic test interpretation and development.