Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal acceleration drives the probability cueing effect in visual search: Evidence for early attentional deployment (N1pc) at high-probability locations.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Multiple mechanisms of response suppression to self-induced sensation during pursuit eye movements.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996).

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Guidance of attention by irrelevant contents of working memory is transient.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Robust generalization of tuning to self-induced sensation.

iScience·2025
Same author

Electrophysiological evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.

Dirk Kerzel1, Leily Zarian, David Souto

  • 1Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland. dirk.kerzel@unige.ch

Journal of Vision
|January 8, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Non-informative peripheral cues do not enhance visual perception when distractors are present. However, informative cues improve performance, and perceptual task difficulty influences involuntary cueing effects.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder
07:51

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder

Published on: June 18, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder
07:51

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder

Published on: June 18, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Vision science
  • Perceptual psychology
  • Cognitive neuroscience

Background:

  • Peripheral cues can guide attention and improve visual perception.
  • Previous research suggested involuntary cueing effects, even with non-informative cues.
  • The role of task difficulty and distractors in cueing effects requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of non-informative peripheral cues on visual perception.
  • To examine how informative cues and task characteristics affect perceptual performance.
  • To determine the conditions under which involuntary cueing effects occur.

Main Methods:

  • Participants reported the orientation of a tilted grating presented with a distractor.
  • Target contrast was manipulated (low and high).
  • Cueing conditions included non-informative peripheral, informative peripheral, and central cues.
  • Tasks varied in speed (unspeeded vs. speeded reaction time).

Main Results:

  • Non-informative peripheral cues did not improve performance when a distractor was present.
  • Informative peripheral and central cues enhanced perceptual performance.
  • Involuntary cueing effects disappeared with distractors in speeded tasks but reappeared without distractors.
  • Increased target contrast and distractors reduced or abolished involuntary cueing effects.

Conclusions:

  • Perceptual task difficulty, particularly the presence of distractors, significantly modulates involuntary cueing effects.
  • Informative cues are effective in enhancing performance, unlike non-informative cues in challenging visual environments.
  • Future research should consider task demands when examining attentional cueing phenomena.