Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Principles of Classical Conditioning01:23

Principles of Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning, as described by Ivan Pavlov, is a foundational concept in associative learning, where a neutral stimulus becomes capable of eliciting a conditioned response through association with an unconditioned stimulus. The process of acquisition, where this learning occurs, and the subsequent phenomena of contiguity, contingency, generalization, discrimination, extinction, and spontaneous recovery are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of classical conditioning.
During the...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning01:15

Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning not only includes the initial pairing of stimuli but also extends to more complex forms, such as higher-order conditioning. Higher-order conditioning involves creating associations beyond the primary conditioned stimulus, resulting in a chain of conditioned responses.
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The evaluation of devaluation: Deficient outcome devaluation leads to wrongly considering goal-directed actions as habits.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The influence of cost on avoidance recovery after fear extinction with response prevention.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same author

The neural basis of habit formation measured in goal-directed response switching.

iScience·2026
Same author

Implicit and explicit reversal of trained oculomotor movements.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2025
Same author

Assessing the validity evidence for habit measures based on time pressure.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

The degraded contingency test fails to detect habit induction in humans.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Spontaneous recovery from interference between cues but not from backward blocking.

David Luque1, Joaquín Morís, Pedro L Cobos

  • 1Departamento de Psicología Básica, University of Málaga, Spain. david.luque@gmail.com

Behavioural Processes
|January 12, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated how delay placement affects backward blocking (BB) and interference between cues (IbC) in humans. Results show spontaneous recovery for IbC but not BB, suggesting distinct underlying psychological processes for each phenomenon.

More Related Videos

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear
11:17

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear

Published on: August 24, 2012

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear
11:17

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear

Published on: August 24, 2012

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Learning and Memory

Background:

  • Backward blocking (BB) and interference between cues (IbC) are key phenomena in associative learning.
  • Understanding the distinct mechanisms of BB and IbC is crucial for cognitive models of learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential impact of delay placement on backward blocking (BB) and interference between cues (IbC).
  • To test predictions from existing models regarding spontaneous recovery (SR) based on delay placement.

Main Methods:

  • Human participants underwent training phases with specific cue arrangements to elicit BB and IbC.
  • A delay was introduced either between training phases or immediately before the test phase.
  • Performance was measured by observing changes in response to cues after the delay and test phase.

Main Results:

  • Spontaneous recovery (SR) of responding was observed for interference between cues (IbC) when the delay preceded the test phase.
  • No significant spontaneous recovery was found for backward blocking (BB) regardless of delay placement.
  • The differential effect of delay position on SR for IbC and BB was statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that backward blocking (BB) and interference between cues (IbC) are mediated by different cognitive processes.
  • Delay placement critically influences spontaneous recovery in interference between cues but not in backward blocking.
  • This study provides empirical evidence supporting distinct theoretical models for BB and IbC.