Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Predictors of adverse events after surgical ventricular restoration for advanced ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Marco Pocar1, Alessandra Di Mauro, Davide Passolunghi
1Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS MultiMedica, Via Milanese 300, I-20099 Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy. marco.pocar@unimi.it
Insights
Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) improves heart function in advanced cardiomyopathy. However, moderate mitral regurgitation and spherical left ventricular geometry predict poorer outcomes, suggesting combined surgical approaches may be beneficial.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Post-infarction ventricular remodelling is a significant concern in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Surgical Ventricular Restoration (SVR) is used for advanced cases (Type III), but outcomes can be suboptimal.
- Identifying predictors of long-term success after SVR is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify geometric and functional predictors of late adverse outcomes following SVR in patients with Type III ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- To evaluate the impact of baseline characteristics on cardiac events and left ventricular remodeling post-SVR.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 31 patients with Type III cardiomyopathy who underwent SVR.
- Inclusion criteria: prior anterior infarction, absent-to-2+ mitral regurgitation, elective surgery, and >18 months follow-up.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariable regression were used to identify predictors of death, heart failure, and left ventricular re-remodeling.
Main Results:
- SVR demonstrated low early and late mortality (0% and 6%).
- Significant early improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and echocardiographic variables were observed.
- Baseline mitral regurgitation and left ventricular sphericity index independently predicted recurrent heart failure and left ventricular re-remodeling.
Conclusions:
- SVR effectively reduces left ventricular volume and improves systolic function in advanced cardiomyopathy.
- Absent-to-moderate mitral regurgitation and a more spherical left ventricular shape are associated with less favorable long-term outcomes.
- Consideration of combined mitral valve repair/annulus undersizing in patients with sphericity index > 0.75 may improve SVR results.
Objective:
Post-infarction ventricular remodelling has been graded (I-III) according to the loss of systolic left ventricular silhouette curvature changes. Although surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) has been extended to type III ischaemic cardiomyopathy, the results are less satisfactory. We sought to identify geometric and functional predictors of late outcome after SVR.
Methods:
Among 144 patients who underwent SVR since 1998, a subgroup of 31 patients (age: 65.2+/-7.6 years) was analysed. Inclusion criteria were: type III cardiomyopathy, no associated procedure except coronary artery bypass grafting, prior anterior infarction, absent-to-2+ mitral regurgitation, elective operation, follow-up > or =18 months (mean: 44+/-26; longest: 96 months). Probability of events was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox multivariable regression model was constructed selecting eight potential predictors of four adverse events: death, cardiac death, recurrent heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) and left ventricular re-remodelling, defined as a 25% increase of end-systolic volume index after SVR, or an end-systolic volume index > or =50 ml.m(-2).
Results:
Early and late mortality were zero and 6% (2/31 patients, one cardiac-related death). NYHA class and all echocardiographic functional variables significantly improved early after SVR. Freedom (+/-standard error (SE)) from heart failure was 97%+/-3%, 93%+/-5%, 77%+/-11% and 64%+/-15%, whereas freedom from left ventricular re-remodelling was 97%+/-3%, 80%+/-8%, 60%+/-12% and 39%+/-15%, respectively, 1, 3, 5 and 7 years after SVR. Multivariable analysis identified baseline mitral regurgitation degree and sphericity index as independent predictors of recurrent heart failure (p=0.025; hazard ratio (HR)=7.80 (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.29-47.19)) and left ventricular re-remodelling (p=0.047; HR=2.84 (95% CIs: 1.01-7.95)). Both predictors also correlated with a higher recurrence of end-systolic volume index > or =50 ml.m(-2) at late follow-up.
Conclusions:
Despite advanced cardiomyopathy, SVR determines left ventricular volume reduction and improved systolic function. Baseline absent-to-moderate mitral regurgitation and a more spherical left ventricular geometry predict a less favourable clinical and functional outcome, suggesting a possible rationale for wider indications for combined correction of 2+ mitral regurgitation and undersizing of the mitral annulus, particularly in patients with sphericity index > or =0.75.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy