Continuous coronary sinus perfusion reverses ongoing myocardial damage in acute ischemia
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Francesco Onorati1, Giuseppe Santarpino, Lucia Cristodoro
1Cardiac Surgery Unit, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy. frankono@libero.it.
Insights
Continuous retrograde warm-blood perfusion (CRWBP) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) significantly improves outcomes for patients experiencing cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest (CS/CA) during acute coronary syndromes. This technique reduces myocardial damage, mortality, and hospital stay, enhancing overall survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Acute cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest (CS/CA) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) installation are critical events in acute coronary syndromes.
- Immediate CPB installation is crucial for managing these life-threatening conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of continuous retrograde warm-blood perfusion (CRWBP) before aortic cross-clamping (ACC) and immediate CPB installation in improving hospital outcomes for patients with CS/CA during acute coronary syndromes.
- To compare outcomes between patients undergoing CRWBP with immediate CPB and those undergoing only immediate CPB.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 18 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients (Group A) with CS/CA receiving CRWBP and immediate CPB, versus 24 CABG patients (Group B) with CS/CA receiving only immediate CPB.
- Key outcome measures included time to CPB, electrocardiographic normalization, duration of CPB and intra-aortic balloon pumping, incidence of postoperative acute myocardial infarction, mortality, need for inotropic support, Troponin I levels, lactate release, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), wall motion score index, intubation time, ITU stay, and hospital stay.
Main Results:
- CRWBP demonstrated a significantly higher rate of electrocardiographic normalization (P = 0.0001).
- Group A (CRWBP) showed reduced CPB time (116.2 ± 21.2 min vs. 157.8 ± 32.4 min; P = 0.0001), shorter postoperative intra-aortic balloon pumping (36.2 ± 5.9 h vs. 77.8 ± 13.2 h; P = 0.0001), and lower incidence of postoperative acute myocardial infarction (P = 0.004), damage (P = 0.033), and death (P = 0.026).
- CRWBP improved postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.017) and wall motion score index (P = 0.041), with shorter intubation (P = 0.0001), ITU (P = 0.001), and hospital stays (P = 0.0001).
Conclusions:
- CRWBP before ACC and immediate CPB installation significantly reverses myocardial damage in patients with CS/CA during acute coronary syndromes.
- This technique offers a straightforward benefit to hospital survival, reducing complications and improving recovery.
- CRWBP is a valuable strategy for enhancing outcomes in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.
Abstract:
Acute cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest (CS/CA) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) installation are life-threatening events in acute coronary syndromes. We evaluated whether continuous retrograde warm-blood perfusion(CRWBP) before aortic cross-clamping (ACC),with immediate CPB installation may improve hospital results in these dreadful events. Hospital outcome of 18 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (Group A) with CS/CA before CPB, with immediate CPB installation and CRWBP,has been compared with 24 CABG (Group B) with CS/CA undergoing only immediate CPB installation. No differences have been detected in the mean time to establish CPB(P = 0.655). Electrocardiography normalized in a significantly higher number of CRWBP (P = 0.0001). Group B showed longer CPB (116.2 +/- 21.2 min vs. 157.8 +/- 32.4;P = 0.0001) and postoperative intra-aortic balloon pumping time course (36.2 +/- 5.9 h vs. 77.8 +/-13.2; P = 0.0001).CRWBP reduced postoperative acute myocardial infarction (P = 0.004) and damage (P = 0.033), death (P = 0.026),and need for high inotropic support (0% vs. 37.5%; P =0.003). Troponin I was significantly lower in Group A(P = 0.013 from coronary sinus; P = 0.0001 at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively; P = 0.008 at 72 h), never reaching values suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. Group A had also lower lactate release from aortic declamping to 48 h postoperatively (P = 0.0001).CRWBP improved post operative left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (P = 0.017)and wall motion score index (P = 0.041), whereas Group B showed a significant worsening of EF (P = 0.0001) and wall motion score index (P = 0.002). Patients in Group A had shorter intubation time (P = 0.0001), intensive therapy unit(ITU) stay (P = 0.001), and hospital stay (P = 0.0001).CRWBP reverses myocardial damage in patients with CS/CA during acute coronary syndromes, adding a straightforward benefit to hospital survival.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Physiology of the Heart: The Cardiac Cycle
Diastole: The Relaxation Phase
During diastole, all four heart chambers relax. The atrioventricular (AV) valves open, and the semilunar valves close. This phase sees the lowest chamber pressures, promoting ventricular filling. Venous blood enters the heart through the...

