Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mutations

Mutations

Mutations are changes in the sequence of DNA. These changes can occur spontaneously or they can be induced by exposure to environmental factors. Mutations can be characterized in a number of different ways: whether and how they alter the amino acid sequence of the protein, whether they occur over a small or large area of DNA, and whether they occur in somatic cells or germline cells.
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...

Mutations

Mutations

Mutations

Mutations

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Point and Frameshift Mutations

Point and Frameshift Mutations

Point mutations are genetic alterations involving the change of a single nucleotide base pair in DNA. Depending on how the alteration affects protein synthesis, they can lead to various consequences.Point mutations fall into the following types:Silent mutations occur when a nucleotide change does not alter the amino acid sequence due to the redundancy of the genetic code. For instance, changing ACC to ACA still encodes threonine, leaving the protein function unaffected. This occurs because...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2026

Same author

MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2026

Same author

Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock in takotsubo syndrome.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2026

Same author

Hemorrhagic complications in a pelvic kidney: the role of interventional radiology: A case report.

Radiology case reports·2025

Same author

MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2025

Same author

MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Analysis of an asymmetric mutation operator.

Thomas Jansen¹, Dirk Sudholt

¹University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. t.jansen@cs.ucc.ie

Evolutionary Computation

|January 13, 2010

Summary

Biased mutation operators in evolutionary algorithms can significantly speed up searches for specific problems, particularly those involving bit strings. However, their effectiveness varies, sometimes increasing runtime or showing no difference compared to unbiased methods.

Area of Science:

Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence
Optimization

Background:

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are randomized search heuristics.
Unbiased search relies solely on fitness, often overlooking problem-specific knowledge.
Biased variation operators can potentially enhance EA performance.

Purpose of the Study:

To rigorously analyze a mutation operator tailored for bit string problems with few 1s or 0s.
To evaluate the impact of biased mutations on the runtime of evolutionary algorithms.
To compare the performance of biased versus unbiased mutation operators.

Main Methods:

Theoretical runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms with biased mutations.
Examination of illustrative example functions and function classes.

More Related Videos

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

Empirical investigations to complement theoretical findings.

Main Results:

Biased mutations offer speedups on specific functions where solutions have few 1s or 0s.
Conversely, biased mutations can increase runtime on other functions.
Performance differences between biased and unbiased operators are function-dependent.

Conclusions:

Tailored biased mutation operators can be highly effective for certain problem classes.
The theoretical and empirical analysis provides insights into the conditions favoring biased mutations.
Understanding these nuances is crucial for optimizing evolutionary algorithm performance.