Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
Pre-Chiasmatic, Single Injection of Autologous Blood to Induce Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Rat Model
Published on: June 18, 2021
A comparative study of the patients with bilateral or unilateral chronic subdural hematoma: precipitating factors and
Tai-Hsin Tsai1, Ann-Shung Lieu, Shiuh-Lin Hwang
1Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Insights
Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) presents with more symptoms of increased intracranial pressure and is linked to anticoagulant use. Unilateral CSDH shows more midline shift on CT scans, but both forms have good outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Neurology
- Radiology
Background:
- Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is common in neurological practice.
- Bilateral CSDH data is scarce compared to unilateral CSDH.
- Understanding differences aids clinical management.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare clinical presentations between bilateral and unilateral CSDH.
- Investigate precipitating factors, CT findings, and outcomes.
- Differentiate characteristics of bilateral versus unilateral CSDH.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 129 surgical CSDH patients (2002-2005).
- Divided patients into bilateral (45) and unilateral (84) groups.
- Analyzed clinical data, CT scans, and postoperative outcomes.
Main Results:
- Bilateral CSDH patients had more nausea, vomiting, headache, and unsteady gait.
- Higher incidence of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy in bilateral CSDH.
- Unilateral CSDH showed greater midline shift on CT scans.
Conclusions:
- Bilateral CSDH is associated with anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy.
- Bilateral CSDH presents with more symptoms of increased intracranial pressure.
- Both bilateral and unilateral CSDH generally have good postoperative outcomes.
Background:
: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a relatively frequent problem in neurologic or neurosurgical practice. Although CSDH is a well-known disease, data on bilateral CSDH are scarce compared with data on unilateral CSDH. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical presentations, precipitating factors, computed tomography (CT) scan findings, postoperative complications, and outcomes between patients with bilateral and unilateral CSDH.
Methods:
: A retrospective study was performed on 129 surgical patients with CSDH from January 2002 to January 2005. These patients were divided into two groups: bilateral CSDH (45 cases) and unilateral CSDH (84 cases). Clinical presentations, precipitating factors, CT scan findings, postoperative complications, and outcomes of patients were analyzed.
Results:
: The mean age was 75 years for patients with bilateral CSDH and was 68 years for patients with unilateral CSDH (p = 0.696). Males predominated in each group (p = 0.696). The frequency of presenting symptoms of nausea and vomiting, headache, or unsteady gait was significantly greater in bilateral CSDH than in unilateral CSDH (p < 0.05). The incidence of usage of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy was significantly higher in bilateral CSDH group than in unilateral CSDH group (p < 0.05). The frequency of marked midline shift on CT scans was significantly greater in unilateral CSDH than in bilateral CSDH (p < 0.05). Coexisting systemic diseases, postoperative complications, and outcomes had no significant differences between both groups.
Conclusions:
: Bilateral CSDH tended to occur more in patients with anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. Compared with patients with unilateral CSDH, patients with bilateral CSDH had more symptoms of increased intracranial pressure and lower incidences of midline shift on CT scans. Most patients with either bilateral or unilateral CSDH had a good postoperative outcome.