The cross-validated adaptive signature design

Boris Freidlin1, Wenyu Jiang, Richard Simon

  • 1Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. freidlinb@ctep.nci.nih.gov

Abstract

Insights

A new cross-validation method enhances the adaptive signature design for clinical trials. This approach improves identifying patient subgroups likely to benefit from anticancer therapies, optimizing treatment effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Genomics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Many anticancer therapies benefit only a subset of patients, yet phase III trials often use broad eligibility criteria.
  • Genomic data from microarrays can identify patient subgroups likely to respond to specific therapies.
  • Developing reliable predictive classifiers for targeted therapies is challenging due to high-dimensional genomic data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a cross-validation extension of the adaptive signature design.
  • To optimize the efficiency of classifier development and validation within a single clinical trial.
  • To improve the identification of patient subpopulations who benefit most from anticancer treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced the adaptive signature design combining classifier development and treatment effect testing.
  • Proposed a cross-validation extension to enhance the adaptive signature design.
  • Evaluated the new design using simulations and application to breast cancer trial data.

Main Results:

  • The cross-validation approach significantly improves the performance of the adaptive signature design.
  • Simulations demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  • The design was successfully applied to real-world breast cancer trial data.

Conclusions:

  • The cross-validation extension offers a more efficient and reliable method for adaptive signature design.
  • This approach enhances the ability to identify sensitive subpopulations for targeted anticancer therapies.
  • Methods for estimating treatment effects in identified subpopulations were described.

Related Concept Videos

Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...