Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase II Study of Adavosertib in Patients With Tumors Containing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1I.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Larotrectinib in Patients With Tumors With <i>NTRK</i> Fusions: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol EAY131-Z1E.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Changing standard of care during a randomized trial: examples, considerations and guidelines.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Crizotinib in Patients with Tumors with MET Amplification or Exon 14 Deletion: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocols C1 and C2.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Phase II Study of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients With Tumors With <i>BRAF</i><sup><i>V600E</i></sup> Mutations: Updated Results From NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol H.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Molecular Profiling for Precision Oncology: Moving Beyond Feasibility and Safety.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
07:40

Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis

Published on: March 20, 2021

Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues.

Boris Freidlin1, Lisa M McShane, Edward L Korn

  • 1Biometric Research Branch, EPN-8122, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. freidlinb@ctep.nci.nih.gov

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|January 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating clinical biomarkers for personalized cancer medicine requires efficient randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Biomarker-stratified designs are recommended for rigorous assessment of biomarker utility in treatment decisions.

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
07:40

Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis

Published on: March 20, 2021

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research
  • Clinical trial design
  • Personalized medicine

Background:

  • Clinical biomarker tests are crucial for personalized cancer medicine.
  • Rigorous evaluation of biomarker utility necessitates large randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used RCT designs for evaluating biomarkers.
  • To guide the design and interpretation of biomarker-focused RCTs.

Main Methods:

  • In-depth comparison of various RCT designs.
  • Analysis of efficiency and interim monitoring considerations.
  • Illustrative examples from ongoing and completed trials.

Main Results:

  • Different RCT designs offer varying levels of efficiency and complexity.
  • Interim monitoring presents unique challenges in biomarker-focused RCTs.

Conclusions:

  • Randomized biomarker-stratified designs are generally preferred for assessing biomarker clinical utility.
  • These designs use biomarkers for analysis but not treatment assignment, ensuring rigorous evaluation.