Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
On group sequential designs comparing two binomial proportions
1Statistics and Evaluation Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1002, USA. james.kepner@cancer.org
Abstract:
Discussed is the problem of sample size determination for one- and two-stage hypothesis tests comparing two binomial proportions using two independent random samples. A FORTRAN compiled search algorithm identifies exact group sequential designs that allow early stopping only for futility or only for efficacy or for either futility or efficacy. The resulting designs yield a substantial savings in terms of total sample size in many practical cases, are seen to satisfy a number of desirable properties, and are compared to other exact one- and two-stage designs and to designs derived based upon asymptotic normal theory methods.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Group Design
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

