Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
Published on: April 22, 2020
Comparison of two methods of assessing dairy cow body condition score
Jeffrey M Bewley1, Robert E Boyce, David J Roberts
1Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. jbewley@uky.edu
Abstract:
Two body condition scoring systems were compared for assessing body condition of cows at the Scottish Agricultural College's Crichton Royal Farm. The weekly body condition scores (BCS) were collected for a period of 12 weeks (5 September-21 November). Scores were obtained using the primary systems utilized within the UK and USA. The USBCS were obtained by the same evaluator each week, while the UKBCS were obtained by two different evaluators alternating between weeks. Paired scores (n=2088) between the two systems within week were moderately correlated (r=0.75, P<0.0001). Regression equations to convert scores between the two systems were created using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC, USA). The simple GLM models to convert from UK to US scores and US to UK scores were USBCS=1.182+0.816 * UKBCS (R2=0.56) and UKBCS=0.131+0.681 (R2=0.56), respectively. These equations may be used to interpret scores within the literature obtained using these two BCS systems, although they must be used with caution.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

