Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
Published on: March 16, 2015
Concurrent sound segregation based on inharmonicity and onset asynchrony
Rosa Lipp1, Padraig Kitterick, Quentin Summerfield
1Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Germany. Rosa.Lipp@uni-konstanz.de
Abstract:
To explore the neural processes underlying concurrent sound segregation, auditory evoked fields (AEFs) were measured using magnetoencephalography (MEG). To induce the segregation of two auditory objects we manipulated harmonicity and onset synchrony. Participants were presented with complex sounds with (i) all harmonics in-tune (ii) the third harmonic mistuned by 8% of its original value (iii) the onset of the third harmonic delayed by 160 ms compared to the other harmonics. During recording, participants listened to the sounds and performed an auditory localisation task whereas in another session they ignored the sounds and performed a visual localisation task. Active and passive listening was chosen to evaluate the contribution of attention on sound segregation. Both cues - inharmonicity and onset asynchrony - elicited sound segregation, as participants were more likely to report correctly on which side they heard the third harmonic when it was mistuned or delayed compared to being in-tune with all other harmonics. AEF activity associated with concurrent sound segregation was identified over both temporal lobes. We found an early deflection at approximately 75 ms (P75m) after sound onset, probably reflecting an automatic registration of the mistuned harmonic. Subsequent deflections, the object-related negativity (ORNm) and a later displacement (P230m) seem to be more general markers of concurrent sound segregation, as they were elicited by both mistuning and delaying the third harmonic. Results indicate that the ORNm reflects relatively automatic, bottom-up sound segregation processes, whereas the P230m is more sensitive to attention, especially with inharmonicity as the cue for concurrent sound segregation.
Related Concept Videos
Sound Waves: Interference
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Aliasing
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original signal...
Parallel Resonance
Beats

