Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...

Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

Good Manufacturing Practices

Good Manufacturing Practices

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) constitute a foundational set of guidelines that ensure the production of safe, consistent, and high-quality products, particularly in industries such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and food processing. These protocols encompass all aspects of production, from the sourcing of raw materials to the final distribution of the finished product.A core pillar of GMP is stringent hygiene and sanitation across all production environments. This includes routine...

Ethical Standards II

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...

Ethical Standards I

Ethical Standards I

The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

CAMPs Summit 2025: reimagining possibilities in wound care.

Journal of wound care·2024

Same author

Opioid agonist treatment and patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in south east Sydney, Australia.

Drug and alcohol review·2021

Same author

Implementation of NICE technology guidance on venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers: a conference report.

Journal of wound care·2019

Same author

Strategies for improving outcomes in venous leg ulcer care.

Journal of wound care·2018

Same author

Is there a difference between debridement and desloughing?

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2015

Same author

The Academy of Physicians in Wound Healing (APWH).

Journal of wound care·2014

Same journal

Journal of wound care·2026

Same journal

Journal of wound care·2026

Same journal

Journal of wound care·2026

Same journal

Journal of wound care·2026

Same journal

Journal of wound care·2026

Same journal

Journal of wound care·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Quality is your safeguard.

Journal of Wound Care

|January 19, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Tissue viability practitioners feel more secure, with less emphasis on safeguarding services. The focus is now on demonstrating the quality and value of tissue viability services to justify further investment.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Clinical Practice
Healthcare Management
Patient Outcomes

Background:

Tissue viability services historically faced threats to their existence and funding.
Practitioners are increasingly shifting from service protection to service validation.
The current climate requires robust evidence of quality and impact.

Discussion:

The perceived increase in job security for tissue viability practitioners is noted.
There's a recognized need for practitioners to proactively demonstrate service value.
This shift implies a move towards outcome-based evaluation and investment justification.

Key Insights:

Tissue viability practitioners are experiencing enhanced professional security.
The discourse has moved from service safeguarding to demonstrating service quality.
Evidence of high-quality, impactful tissue viability services is crucial for future investment.

Outlook:

Future efforts should concentrate on developing metrics to prove service efficacy.
Practitioners must be equipped to showcase the return on investment for tissue viability interventions.
Sustained focus on quality demonstration will secure and enhance tissue viability services.