Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Testing Water Quality01:14

Testing Water Quality

When the quality of water for concrete preparation is uncertain, its impact on the setting time of cement and compressive strength of mortar is assessed by comparison with de-ionized or distilled water benchmarks. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1602 requires the setting times to be within 90 minutes of the control, British Standard (BS) 3146:1980 allows a 30-minute variance in the initial setting, while British Standards European Norm (BS EN) 1008 specifies initial setting...
Fisher's Exact Test01:08

Fisher's Exact Test

Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of the...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sociodemographic and clinical determinants of general practice consultation frequency among regular patients in Australia: a national study.

BJGP open·2026
Same author

High-throughput bacterial aggregation analysis in droplets.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Noninvasive genotyping and early disease dynamics demonstrate the efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with immunochemotherapy in patients with mantle cell lymphoma treated in the TRIANGLE trial.

Leukemia·2025
Same author

Correlation between P53 immunohistochemical staining and TP53 molecular testing in endometrial carcinomas: a detailed assessment of discrepant cases with implications for patient management.

Histopathology·2025
Same author

Challenges in predicting outcomes for watch and wait follicular lymphoma patients: insights into clinical, pathological, and molecular factors.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2025
Same author

Technological Model to Optimize the Request for Radiological Studies.

Cureus·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

Equivalence versus classical statistical tests in water quality assessments.

Murage Ngatia1, David Gonzalez, Steve San Julian

  • 1Municipal Water Quality Investigations Program, Division of Environmental Services, California Department of Water Resources, P.O. Box 942836, Sacramento, CA, USA. mngatia@water.ca.gov

Journal of Environmental Monitoring : JEM
|January 19, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Equivalence tests offer a more practical approach than null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST) for environmental water quality assessments. They confirm if field instrument data is comparable to lab data within meaningful precision limits.

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST) is common in environmental assessments but has limitations.
  • NHST's p-values can be influenced by sample size and may indicate trivial differences as significant.
  • Equivalence tests offer a practical alternative by incorporating decision criteria relevant to study objectives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of equivalence tests as an alternative to NHST for environmental data comparison.
  • To assess if unattended field organic carbon instruments provide data comparable to laboratory-generated data.
  • To demonstrate the application of equivalence tests in water quality assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of data between two unattended field organic carbon instruments.
  • Comparison of field instrument data against laboratory-generated data.
  • Application of both Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing (NHST) and equivalence tests for data evaluation.

Main Results:

  • NHST indicated statistically significant differences between field instruments and between field and laboratory data.
  • Equivalence tests demonstrated that the data from field instruments were equivalent to laboratory data within a defined precision interval.
  • The results highlight the practical relevance of equivalence tests in environmental monitoring.

Conclusions:

  • Equivalence tests provide more meaningful interpretations of water quality data compared to NHST.
  • Equivalence tests allow for the incorporation of practical significance into statistical evaluations.
  • The study recommends wider adoption of equivalence tests in environmental assessments for robust data comparison.