Comparison of methods for the repair of acute tympanic membrane perforations: Silk patch vs. paper patch

We investigated the effects of repairing large tympanic membrane (TM) perforations in rats with a thin silk patch compared with the commonly used paper patch. We performed bilateral myringotomies of 1.8 mm in diameter on 50 adult Sprague-Dawley rats with intact TMs. The perforations in the right ears of 40 rats were treated with a silk patch, and the perforations in the left ears of the same rats were treated with a paper patch. Ten rats acted as controls. The mean healing times of the TM perforations on the silk-patch-treated ears and the paper-patch-treated ears were 7.2+/-1.48 and 9.1+/-1.11 days, respectively (control 10.38+/-1.70 days). The difference between silk-patch- and paper-patch-treated ears was statistically significant, with a mean difference of 1.9 days (0.6-4.5 days). The mean perforation closure times were significantly shorter in silk-patch- and paper-patch-treated ears than in the control animals. The endoscopic and histological findings of this study provide evidence that silk-patch treatment accelerates wound healing and shortens TM perforation closure time. We suggest that the silk patch may prove to be an effective material for repairing TM perforations in human patients in an outpatient clinical setting.