Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Motivating interdependent teams: individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between?
Matthew J Pearsall1, Michael S Christian, Aleksander P J Ellis
1Management and Organization Department, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742- 1815, USA. mpearsall@rhsmith.umd.edu
The Journal of Applied Psychology
|January 21, 2010
Summary
Hybrid rewards boost team performance by improving information sharing and reducing social loafing, outperforming individual and shared reward systems. This study offers insights into team motivation and effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Team Dynamics
- Motivation Science
Background:
- Understanding team motivation is crucial for enhancing collective performance.
- Previous research has explored individual, shared, and team-based rewards.
- The specific impact and mechanisms of hybrid reward systems on teams require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of hybrid rewards on team performance.
- To examine the mediating roles of information allocation and social loafing in the reward-performance relationship.
- To compare hybrid rewards against individual and shared reward structures within teams.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a command-and-control simulation involving 90 teams.
- Assessed team performance outcomes.
- Measured information allocation and social loafing as potential mechanisms.
Main Results:
- Hybrid rewards significantly enhanced team performance compared to individual and shared rewards.
- Increased information allocation was identified as a key mechanism driving the benefits of hybrid rewards.
- Reductions in social loafing were also observed, contributing to higher team performance under hybrid reward conditions.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid reward systems are effective in improving team performance.
- The benefits of hybrid rewards are explained by enhanced information sharing and decreased social loafing.
- Findings support the integration of hybrid rewards to optimize team motivation and productivity.
Related Concept Videos
01:37Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
01:18Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between intrinsic and...
The theory differentiates between intrinsic and...
01:17Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory
Self-Determination Theory (SDT), formulated by Richard Ryan and Edward Deci, explains that human motivation is driven by three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. When these needs are met, individuals experience personal growth, intrinsic motivation, and overall well-being.
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who is...
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who is...
01:26Equity Theory
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
01:25Impact of Individuals on a Group
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
01:24Reinforcement Schedules
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Once a behavior is learned,...