Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients
Published on: October 17, 2017
Prospective collection and analysis of error data in a neurosurgical clinic
Jan Boström1, Ahmad Yacoub, Johannes Schramm
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bonn Medical Center, Germany. Jan.Bostroem@ukb.uni-bonn.de
Objectives:
It is still unknown how often surgical errors lead to clinical impact and contribute to complications for patients. Hence, reliable and detailed prospective collection and analysis of error data is considered essential and a valuable key to error prevention.
Patients And Methods:
In a mono center study, errors and complications were prospectively recorded concerning consecutive patients undergoing elective and emergency neurosurgical procedures. A broad error definition (deviation from an optimal course=DOC) was used to catch as much as possible errors. Each error was scored for type, severity, preventability, and consequence.
Results:
More than 1100 consecutive operative cases were studied, 756 cases could be evaluated, among them 529 elective and 227 emergency cases. A total of 190 DOC (25%) were found. The most common DOC was primarily due to (a) equipment failure or missing equipment, then to (b) pre-operative mismanagement, and only to (c) non-optimal procedures. 26% DOC were classified as medical, 69% as non-medical, and 5% as combined. Of all deviations identified, 16% were considered relevant errors, with only 4% slightly impacting the clinical course of the patient. Hence, in less than 1% of all cases a clinically relevant medical error occurred. 19% of all DOC were deemed not preventable. Unexpectedly, the error rate in emergency cases was lower than in elective cases (14% vs. 30%). A propensity for error was discovered with regard to technically complex cranial procedures and patients with higher ASA scores. Without permanent supervision, the documented error rate was significantly lower.
Conclusion:
We were able to identify typical reoccurring deviations and discovered several procedure- and patient-related characteristics. Medical errors with relevant clinical impact were rare. Unexpectedly, the error rate in emergency cases was lower than in elective cases. Prospective error documentation and analysis are valuable, but also time-consuming since permanent close supervision is required for maintaining documentation quality.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Data Collection I
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...