Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The landing of field mosquitoes on permethrin-treated military uniforms in queensland, australia.

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association·2015
Same author

Comparative laboratory and field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and lemon eucalyptus oil against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association·2014
Same author

Alternative processes in the identification of familiar pictures.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Field evaluation of deet against Anopheles farauti at Ndendo (Santa Cruz) Island, Solomon Islands.

Journal of medical entomology·2010
Same author

Malaria vectors of Papua New Guinea.

International journal for parasitology·2009
Same author

Evaluation of the inhibition of egg laying, larvicidal effects, and bloodfeeding success of Aedes aegypti exposed to permethrin- and bifenthrin-treated military tent fabric.

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field
10:49

Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field

Published on: March 16, 2019

Comparative field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and IR3535 against mosquitoes in Queensland,

S P Frances1, D O MacKenzie, K L Rowcliffe

  • 1Australian Army Malaria Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggera, Queensland 4051, Australia, USA.

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association
|January 27, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

DEET (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) demonstrated superior mosquito protection compared to IR3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) in Australian field trials. DEET offered longer-lasting repellent efficacy against various mosquito species.

More Related Videos

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies
09:37

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

Published on: January 19, 2022

Protocols for Testing the Toxicity of Novel Insecticidal Chemistries to Mosquitoes
09:32

Protocols for Testing the Toxicity of Novel Insecticidal Chemistries to Mosquitoes

Published on: February 13, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field
10:49

Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field

Published on: March 16, 2019

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies
09:37

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

Published on: January 19, 2022

Protocols for Testing the Toxicity of Novel Insecticidal Chemistries to Mosquitoes
09:32

Protocols for Testing the Toxicity of Novel Insecticidal Chemistries to Mosquitoes

Published on: February 13, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Entomology
  • Public Health
  • Chemical Ecology

Background:

  • Mosquito-borne diseases pose a significant global health threat.
  • Effective insect repellents are crucial for personal protection.
  • IR3535 and DEET are common active ingredients in repellent formulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of a repellent containing IR3535 with one containing DEET against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.
  • To evaluate the duration of protection offered by each repellent formulation.

Main Methods:

  • Two field trials were conducted in Queensland, Australia, in 2006 and 2007.
  • Repellents tested included Avon Bug Guard (7.5% IR3535) and Australian Defense Force (ADF) DEET (35% DEET).
  • Mosquito species collected and protection duration were recorded.

Main Results:

  • In the first trial, ADF DEET provided 5 hours of protection, while Avon Bug Guard offered only 1 hour.
  • In the second trial, ADF DEET provided 5 hours of protection, whereas Avon Bug Guard offered 85% protection for 1 hour.
  • Predominant mosquito species included Mansonia uniformis, Culex annulirostris, and Aedes vigilax.

Conclusions:

  • ADF DEET provided significantly longer and more effective protection against mosquitoes than Avon Bug Guard (IR3535).
  • DEET-based repellents demonstrate superior efficacy for personal protection against mosquito bites in this Australian context.