Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Postsynaptic Potential (PSP)01:32

Postsynaptic Potential (PSP)

Postsynaptic potential (PSP) refers to a change in the electrical potential of a neuron when neurotransmitters released by presynaptic neurons bind to postsynaptic receptors. This potential can either be excitatory, leading to depolarization and ultimately action potential generation, or inhibitory, leading to hyperpolarization and suppression of the postsynaptic neuron.
There are two types of receptors: ionotropic and metabotropic.
The ionotropic receptor is the membrane protein that has an...
Action Potential: Phases of Stimulation01:28

Action Potential: Phases of Stimulation

The action potential is a complex electrical event that occurs in excitable cells, such as neurons and muscle cells. It consists of several distinct phases, each with specific characteristics.
Resting Phase:
In this phase, the cell's membrane is at its resting potential, typically around -70 millivolts (mV) for neurons. Inside the cell, there is a higher concentration of potassium ions (K+) and a lower concentration of sodium ions (Na+). Voltage-gated sodium channels are closed, and...
Propagation of Action Potentials01:23

Propagation of Action Potentials

The propagation of an action potential refers to the process by which a nerve impulse, or "action potential," travels along a neuron.
Neurons (nerve cells) have a resting membrane potential, with a slightly negative charge inside compared to outside. This is maintained by ion channels, such as sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) channels, which control the flow of ions. When a stimulus, like a touch or a signal from another neuron, triggers the neuron, sodium channels open, allowing sodium ions to...
Resting Potential Decay01:15

Resting Potential Decay

The resting membrane potential of a neuron (-70mV) is sustained due to the selective ion permeability of the membrane. At the resting potential, the membrane is slightly permeable to ions like sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) and highly permeable to potassium ions (K+). Differences in the ions' concentration inside the cell compared to the outside are maintained by membrane transport proteins like channels and pumps.
At rest, the K+ is the main ion that moves across the membrane through...
Resting Potential Decay01:15

Resting Potential Decay

The resting membrane potential of a neuron (-70mV) is sustained due to the selective ion permeability of the membrane. At the resting potential, the membrane is slightly permeable to ions like sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) and highly permeable to potassium ions (K+). Differences in the ions' concentration inside the cell compared to the outside are maintained by membrane transport proteins like channels and pumps.
At rest, the K+ is the main ion that moves across the membrane through...
Graded Potential01:19

Graded Potential

Graded potentials are localized fluctuations in the cell membrane's electrical charge, commonly found in the dendrites of neurons. The magnitude of these potential changes depends on the strength of the initiating stimulus. In a membrane at its resting potential, a graded potential signifies a voltage shift either above -70 mV or below -70 mV.
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or calcium...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A concise overview of using the P300 component of the event-related potential for objective estimation of visual acuity.

Frontiers in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Temporal trends in refractive error among children and adolescents in Germany - a large-scale analysis of spectacle sales data from dispensing opticians from 2001 to 2025.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Impact of pulsed stimulation on objective and subjective visual acuity measurements in nystagmus.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Somatosensory cross-modal activation and changes in cortical somatosensory evoked potential responses in single-sided deafness: an EEG study.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

Dioptric blur is not fully reflected by VEP-based visual acuity estimates.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Optical coherence tomography in patients with major depressive disorder.

BMC psychiatry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Some thoughts on the interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials.

Sven P Heinrich1

  • 1Sektion Funktionelle Sehforschung, Univ-Augenklinik, Killianstr 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. sven.heinrich@uniklinik-freiburg.de

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|January 27, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Steady-state evoked potentials (SSEPs) can be misinterpreted. Signal superposition can mask neural activity or create inaccurate amplitude comparisons, necessitating careful interpretation beyond frequency analysis.

More Related Videos

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Steady-state evoked potentials (SSEPs) are widely used for objective neural response detection due to straightforward frequency-domain analysis.
  • Interpreting SSEPs can be complex because they arise from the summation of responses to individual stimuli.
  • Challenges include signal extinction and understanding higher harmonics, particularly for those less familiar with frequency-space data representations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify potential misinterpretations of steady-state evoked potentials (SSEPs).
  • To illustrate issues of signal extinction and higher harmonics using model data.
  • To emphasize the importance of considering signal composition before inferring neural physiology.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simple model data to demonstrate signal extinction and higher harmonic characteristics.
  • Focused on explaining frequency-space representations for a broader audience.
  • Emphasized the principles of constructive and destructive superposition of individual responses.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that the absence of an SSEP does not necessarily indicate a lack of neural activity.
  • Illustrated how constructive and destructive superposition can lead to signal extinction.
  • Showed that amplitude comparisons between experimental conditions can be inaccurate due to superposition effects.

Conclusions:

  • The interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials requires careful consideration of signal composition.
  • Absence of a detectable response does not rule out underlying neural activity.
  • Alternative explanations based on signal superposition should be considered before drawing physiological conclusions from SSEP amplitudes.