Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

05:59
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study
Fiona C Bull1, Tahlia S Maslin, Timothy Armstrong
1School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Loughborough, Perth, Australia.
Journal of Physical Activity & Health
|January 28, 2010
Summary
The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) shows reproducible results and correlates well with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). While criterion validity was weak, GPAQ is suitable for physical activity surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- International physical activity surveillance requires validated assessment instruments.
- The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) is a tool for monitoring physical activity.
- Assessing the reliability and validity of GPAQ is crucial for its widespread adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and validity of the GPAQ.
- To compare GPAQ with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
- To determine GPAQ's suitability for international physical activity surveillance.
Main Methods:
- Recruited 2657 adults from diverse backgrounds across 9 countries.
- Administered GPAQ and IPAQ on multiple occasions.
- Assessed criterion validity using objective measures (pedometers/accelerometers) in 8 countries.
Main Results:
- GPAQ demonstrated moderate to substantial reliability (Kappa 0.67-0.73; rho 0.67-0.81).
- Concurrent validity between GPAQ and IPAQ showed moderate to strong positive correlations (0.45-0.65).
- Criterion validity results were poor to fair (0.06-0.35), with variations across demographic groups and countries.
Conclusions:
- GPAQ provides reproducible data and correlates well with IPAQ.
- Despite poor criterion validity, GPAQ is deemed acceptable for population health surveillance.
- Further validation studies in diverse international settings are recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Assessing the gastrointestinal (GI) system is a complex process that begins with collecting subjective data. This data, collected through patient interviews, provides crucial insights into the patient's health history, perception patterns, and lifestyle habits, all contributing significantly to GI health.
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
