Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical judgment and bioethics: the decision making link.

R A Wright1

  • 1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190-3046.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seascape connectivity: evidence, knowledge gaps and implications for temperate coastal ecosystem restoration practice and policy.

npj ocean sustainability·2025
Same author

The SSTARS (STeroids and Stents Against Re-Stenosis) Trial: Different stent alloys and the use of peri-procedural oral corticosteroids to prevent in-segment restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

International journal of cardiology·2016
Same author

The dancing heart.

European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care·2014
Same author

Effects of body mass and water temperature on routine metabolism of American paddlefish Polyodon spathula.

Journal of fish biology·2013
Same author

Effects of temperature, salinity and body size on routine metabolism of coastal largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides.

Journal of fish biology·2012
Same author

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2009

This study identifies five universal decision-making components crucial for understanding bioethics and its teaching. Applying these components can unify the diverse bioethics literature and improve educational frameworks.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Ethics Education

Background:

  • The existing literature on bioethics decision-making is fragmented and lacks a cohesive framework.
  • This fragmentation extends to the teaching of bioethics, leading to confusion and contradictory approaches for learners.
  • Contemporary bioethics literature often exhibits separatism, particularly in professional contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify universal components of decision-making applicable to bioethics.
  • To analyze the influence of these components on bioethics decision-making and teaching.
  • To propose a framework for unifying bioethics literature and improving its instruction.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of bioethics decision-making processes.
  • Identification and articulation of five core decision components.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the impact of these components on bioethics education and professional literature.

    • Main Results:

    • Five fundamental decision-making components common to all decision-making were identified.
    • These components significantly influence both the practice of bioethics and its pedagogy.
    • The proposed components demonstrate potential in bridging the disciplinary divides within bioethics literature.

    Conclusions:

    • A unified approach to bioethics decision-making and teaching is achievable through the application of five core components.
    • These components offer a valuable framework for enhancing bioethics education and research.
    • Addressing the separatism in bioethics literature can be facilitated by this integrated decision-making model.