Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Classification of cardiac pacemakers: the pacemaker code.

The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

|April 1, 1991

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Treating tachyarrhythmias with radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN·2002

Same author

Wall stress-induced dysrhythmias in the isolated working rat heart perfused through a cannula placed in the left ventricle via aorta.

Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods·2000

Same author

Radiofrequency catheter ablation. Controlling tachyarrhythmias.

Nursing·1995

Same author

Cellular signals in atherosclerosis.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·1994

Same author

Transcatheter ablation of tachyarrhythmias: an overview and case studies.

Progress in cardiovascular nursing·1994

Same author

Hypertensive crisis: review and update.

Critical care nurse·1993

Same journal

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Anxiety and Depression in Individuals With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Telemonitoring Versus Usual Care on Readmission and Mortality Rates in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Contemporary Lipid Guidelines: Key Updates and Implications for Cardiovascular Nurses.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

The Interplay Between Physical Symptoms, Benefit Finding, Patient Activation, Social Support, Family Function, and Hope in Patients With Heart Failure: A Network Analysis.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Self-Care, Treatment Adherence, and Frailty in Older Adults With Hypertension: A Descriptive Correlational Study.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Predictors of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Heart Valve Surgery: A Case-Control Study.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

See all related articles

Understanding pacemaker codes is crucial for nurses managing patients with permanent pacemakers. This article explains the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology and British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group classification codes and their link to pacemaker features.

Area of Science:

Cardiology
Medical Device Technology

Background:

Permanent pacemakers are vital for managing cardiac rhythm disorders.
Effective patient care necessitates understanding pacemaker functionality.
Standardized coding systems facilitate communication regarding pacemaker function.

Purpose of the Study:

To elucidate the pacemaker classification codes used by major electrophysiology societies.
To highlight the importance of these codes for healthcare professionals, particularly nurses.
To demonstrate the relationship between pacemaker classification codes and device characteristics.

Main Methods:

Review and comparison of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) pacemaker code.
Review and comparison of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group (BPEG) pacemaker code.

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of how these codes correlate with specific pacemaker functions and settings.

Main Results:

Both NASPE and BPEG codes provide a structured method for describing pacemaker function.
Understanding these codes allows for precise identification of pacemaker capabilities and limitations.
The codes directly relate to pacing modes, sensitivity, response to R-wave, and rate modulation features.

Conclusions:

Familiarity with NASPE and BPEG pacemaker codes is essential for nurses providing care to patients with permanent pacemakers.
Accurate interpretation of pacemaker codes ensures appropriate patient management and troubleshooting.
Standardized pacemaker nomenclature enhances the quality and safety of cardiac pacing care.