Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of Type of Speech Equalization and Averaging Method on the Long-Term Average Speech Spectra of Five Indian Languages and British English.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Individual differences in spectral temporal order judgment are associated with temporal fine structure processing.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Asymmetries in human judgements of distance for approaching and receding sounds are predicted by a loudness model for time-varying sounds.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Effects of hearing loss, sex, age, noise exposure and listening skills on the detection of amplitude modulation of a 4-kHz carrier.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Calculation of lower bounds on the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests: relevance to the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Hearing Aids: What Works Well and What Can Be Improved.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same journal

Audiologists' views on patient empowerment in hearing rehabilitation: a focus group study.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on models of in-person and remote cochlear implant aftercare and the opportunities and challenges for change.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Personal listening device usage, leisure noise exposure, hearing protection usage and hearing at standard frequencies: a longitudinal study from child/adolescence to young adulthood.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Cross-modal attentional allocation in individuals with listening difficulties: evidence from a complex dual-task paradigm.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Using NAL-NL3 in clinical practice: a modular NAL fitting system for real-world listening needs.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Does the Apple airpods pro 2 hearing aid feature meet prescribed targets for standardized audiograms?

International journal of audiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies.

Robert H Margolis1, Brian R Glasberg, Sarah Creeke

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA. margo001@umn.edu

International Journal of Audiology
|January 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated audiometry (AMTAS) shows promise for air-conduction hearing tests but requires further validation for bone-conduction thresholds. Studies compared AMTAS to manual audiometry, identifying areas for improvement in automated hearing assessments.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Traditional audiometry is the standard for hearing assessments.
  • Automated methods offer potential for increased efficiency and accessibility.
  • Validating new automated hearing test technologies is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the validity of the Automated Method for Audiometric Testing and Screening (AMTAS).
  • To compare AMTAS-derived audiograms with traditional manual audiometry.
  • To investigate the reliability and sources of error in AMTAS, particularly for bone-conduction thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Three studies were conducted involving manual audiometry and AMTAS.
  • AMTAS utilized a forehead-placed transducer for air- and bone-conduction stimuli.
  • Inter-tester reliability of manual audiometry was established; AMTAS results were compared to manual audiometry and inter-tester differences.

Main Results:

  • AMTAS air-conduction thresholds showed differences comparable to inter-tester variability in manual audiometry.
  • AMTAS bone-conduction thresholds exhibited larger differences compared to manual audiometry.
  • Potential causes for bone-conduction discrepancies include reference force levels and middle-ear disease effects.

Conclusions:

  • AMTAS demonstrates acceptable validity for air-conduction threshold measurements.
  • Further research is needed to refine AMTAS for accurate bone-conduction threshold assessment.
  • Forehead and mastoid bone-conduction sites showed similar intersubject variability.