Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intraprocedural thrombotic events during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes are associated with adverse outcomes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2012
Same author

What is the optimal antithrombotic strategy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention?

Current opinion in cardiology·2012
Same author

Impact of the presence and extent of incomplete angiographic revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial.

Circulation·2012
Same author

Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in primary angioplasty: a pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Archives of internal medicine·2012
Same author

A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) study.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2012
Same author

An intravascular ultrasound appraisal of atherosclerotic plaque distribution in diseased coronary arteries.

American heart journal·2012
Same journal

Aortic Valve Replacement in Women of Reproductive Age.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Sudden Death in Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Patients: Insights From FINE-HEART.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Ultra-Thin Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients: The TUXEDO-2 Trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Reframing Cardiometabolic Risk and Frailty Through Sarcopenic Obesity.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Imaging-Derived Sarcopenic Obesity and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Insights Into Heart Failure Risk and Muscle Biology.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

The Measure of a Leader: Lessons in Leadership From Eugene Braunwald.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Randomized trials, statistics, and clinical inference.

Gregg W Stone1, Stuart J Pocock

  • 1Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York 10023, USA. gs2184@columbia.edu

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
|February 2, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Critically appraising randomized controlled trials is vital for evidence-based medicine. This commentary highlights common misrepresentations in trial design and interpretation, often stemming from underpowered studies, to improve clinical care.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for medical practice but often suffer from poor design and quality control.
  • Inadequate assessment can lead to suboptimal clinical decisions and misguided future research.
  • This report details common misrepresentations in RCTs, emphasizing issues from underpowered studies.

Discussion:

  • Underpowered studies frequently lead to overly optimistic or unjustified conclusions.
  • Caution is advised when evaluating composite outcomes, secondary endpoints, and subgroup analyses.
  • Meta-analyses and meta-regressions require careful interpretation due to potential biases.

Key Insights:

  • Misinterpretations in RCTs can significantly impact patient care and research direction.
  • Underpowered studies are a major source of flawed conclusions.
  • Critical appraisal skills are essential for all stakeholders involved in medical research.

Outlook:

  • Sponsors and investigators must prioritize robust trial design and execution.
  • Practitioners, guideline committees, editors, and regulators play a key role in critically evaluating trial data.
  • Implementing principles for improved RCT design and appraisal will enhance the reliability of medical evidence.