Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In vitro optical characterization of the RayOne Galaxy spiral extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens using high-resolution Mach-Zehnder interferometry.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

Outcomes of open dorsal proximal interphalangeal joint dislocations.

The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2026
Same author

First Report of Circular Rainbow Glare After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

IOL power calculation in cataract surgery: closed-form sensitivities to biometric uncertainties.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same author

Survival and Recurrence of Infection After Revision of Infected Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A French Multicenter Study (2013-2023) of 137 infected Total Elbow Arthroplasties.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2026
Same author

Evaluation of a New Algorithm-Based Approach in Subjective Refraction.

Journal of ophthalmology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

High-precision Electromagnetic Flowmeter with Empty Pipe Detection via Complex Programmable Logic Device-based Waveform Recognition
05:11

High-precision Electromagnetic Flowmeter with Empty Pipe Detection via Complex Programmable Logic Device-based Waveform Recognition

Published on: June 27, 2025

Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system.

Alain Saad1, Marc Saab, Damien Gatinel

  • 1Rothschild Foundation, AP-HP Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, University Paris VII, Paris, France.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|February 2, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study demonstrates that a double-pass system provides repeatable measurements for objective scattering index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF), and Strehl ratio. The system

More Related Videos

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
09:02

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

Published on: January 31, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

High-precision Electromagnetic Flowmeter with Empty Pipe Detection via Complex Programmable Logic Device-based Waveform Recognition
05:11

High-precision Electromagnetic Flowmeter with Empty Pipe Detection via Complex Programmable Logic Device-based Waveform Recognition

Published on: June 27, 2025

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
09:02

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

Published on: January 31, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optical Engineering
  • Biomedical Optics

Background:

  • Assessing visual quality and light scattering is crucial in ophthalmology.
  • Double-pass systems offer a method for quantifying optical performance.
  • Understanding the repeatability of these measurements is essential for clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the measurement repeatability of a double-pass system.
  • To assess the reliability of objective scattering index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, and Strehl ratio measurements.
  • To determine if the system is suitable for quantitative scattering assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Eyes were categorized into control groups (younger and older), post-refractive surgery, and cataract groups.
  • Measurements were performed using the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS).
  • Repeatability limits were calculated from individual standard deviations for OSI, MTF cutoff, and Strehl ratio.

Main Results:

  • Forty-two eyes were analyzed across the different groups.
  • Mean OSI values varied significantly, with the cataract group showing the highest (6.15 +/- 0.50).
  • Repeatability limits were found to be good and comparable across OSI (33.5%), MTF cutoff (31.1%), and Strehl ratio (31%).

Conclusions:

  • The double-pass system demonstrates good and equivalent repeatability for OSI, MTF, and Strehl ratio measurements.
  • A wide interval between normal and pathological thresholds for OSI suggests reliable quantitative scattering assessment.
  • The system's reliability meets the requirements for clinical use in evaluating light scattering.