Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Natural Selection and Adaptation01:15

Natural Selection and Adaptation

Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations, psychological...
The Influence of Cognition on Affect01:29

The Influence of Cognition on Affect

Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be interpreted as...
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Adler's Individual Psychology01:28

Adler's Individual Psychology

Alfred Adler, a prominent figure in psychology, founded the school of individual psychology. In contrast to Freud's emphasis on sexual or aggressive motives, Adler suggested that individuals are primarily motivated by their purposes and goals. He believed that people strive for perfection rather than pleasure. Adler argued that individuals could creatively act upon their genetic inheritance and environmental experiences to shape their own lives, emphasizing conscious motivation over unconscious...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Context-specific allocation of attentional control in anxiety and uncontrollability.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same author

Correction: Cognitive load-dependent effects of HD-tDCS on the executive vigilance decrement: insights from aperiodic EEG activity.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Cognitive load-dependent effects of HD-tDCS on the executive vigilance decrement: insights from aperiodic EEG activity.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Understanding vigilance and its decrement: theoretical, contextual, and neural insights.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

The Effect of Sex and Gender-Role on Social Attention: Investigating the Association With Social Skills and Academic Preferences.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2026
Same author

When arrows behave like eyes: Reversal of spatial stroop interference by visual masking.

Cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects.

Maria Jesús Funes1, Juan Lupiáñez, Glyn Humphreys

  • 1University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain. mjfunes@ugr.es

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive control adapts to conflict, showing specificity for conflict types. This suggests distinct control mechanisms manage different kinds of cognitive conflict, rather than general adaptation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Conflict adaptation effects reduce interference after incongruent trials.
  • Understanding specificity versus generality of these effects is crucial for cognitive control models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate conditions for conflict-specific versus general adaptation effects.
  • Determine if feature integration explains conflict type specificity.

Main Methods:

  • Combined two conflict types with distinct sources of incompatibility.
  • Kept task context constant across conflict types.
  • Examined feature integration's role in conflict adaptation specificity.

Main Results:

  • Observed clear specificity of conflict adaptation across different conflict types.
  • Found feature integration did not account for this conflict type specificity.

Conclusions:

  • Data support separate control modes for distinct types of cognitive conflict.
  • Conflict adaptation is specific to the type of conflict encountered.