Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Unlocking the closed door: arguments for open access hospice
Christian Davis Furman1, David John Doukas, William Reichel
1University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA. cdfurm02@louisville.edu
Abstract:
The traditional view of standard hospice (SH) care is that once begun, the doorway toward curative and other forms of nonpalliative treatment is irrevocably locked. We will argue that such a traditional view needs to be reassessed in light of new arguments and data regarding access to these avenues of treatment. We will argue that patients should be supported in their transition from SH to open access hospice (OAH). Open access hospice should be available to all patients because of ethical arguments, patient satisfaction arguments, and costs of care arguments. More randomized controlled research trials need to be performed to study the impact of OAH versus SH. This research should focus on patient satisfaction, cost, and survival.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Continuing Care
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Standards of Care II