Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
A comparative analysis of MMPI-2 malingering detection models among inmates
Jarrod S Steffan1, Robert D Morgan, Jeahoon Lee
1Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA. jarrod.steffan@hotmail.com
Abstract:
There are several strategies, or models, for combining the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) validity indicators to detect malingered psychiatric symptoms. Some scholars have recommended that an elevated F (Infrequency) score should be followed by the inspection of Fp (Infrequency-Psychopathology), whereas a recent meta-analysis indicated that Fp and Ds (Gough's Dissimulation Scale) should be examined. For correctional settings, one model of malingering suggests that F, Fp, and F - K (Gough's Dissimulation Index) should be inspected for one or more elevated scores. Although a large body of research has examined malingering detection with the MMPI-2, this research has typically focused on the contributions of individual validity indicators to differentiate malingered from genuine psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, the current study compared these models of malingering detection on the MMPI-2. Inmate simulators were contrasted with inmates who were hospitalized for psychiatric treatment. Results from classification and logistic regression analyses supported the sequential use of F and Fp in malingering detection.
Insights
This study compared Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) models for detecting malingered psychiatric symptoms. The sequential use of the F (Infrequency) and Fp (Infrequency-Psychopathology) scales proved most effective in distinguishing simulators from genuine patients.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Forensic psychology
- Clinical psychology
Background:
- Detecting malingered psychiatric symptoms is crucial in forensic and clinical settings.
- Various models exist for combining Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) validity indicators.
- Previous research often focused on individual MMPI-2 validity scales rather than combined models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare different models for combining MMPI-2 validity indicators to detect malingering.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of various MMPI-2 validity scale combinations in differentiating genuine from simulated psychiatric symptoms.
Main Methods:
- The study contrasted inmate simulators with inmates hospitalized for psychiatric treatment.
- Classification and logistic regression analyses were employed to compare malingering detection models.
- Specific MMPI-2 validity indicators (F, Fp, Ds, F-K) and their combinations were examined.
Main Results:
- The sequential application of the F (Infrequency) and Fp (Infrequency-Psychopathology) scales demonstrated superior performance in malingering detection.
- This sequential model effectively differentiated between individuals simulating psychiatric symptoms and those with genuine conditions.
- The findings provide empirical support for a specific strategy in MMPI-2 based malingering assessment.
Conclusions:
- The sequential use of F and Fp scales is a recommended strategy for detecting malingered psychiatric symptoms using the MMPI-2.
- This approach offers a more robust method for distinguishing genuine from feigned psychopathology compared to other examined models.
- The study contributes to refining assessment practices in forensic and clinical psychology.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Understanding Deception
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
The Stanford Prison Experiment
