Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Adjusting a Traverse01:12

Adjusting a Traverse

In the site survey of a four-sided traverse, internal angles are essential to ensure geometric accuracy. The survey revealed that the sum of the measured internal angles was 359 degrees and 48 minutes, which is 12 minutes less than the expected 360 degrees. This discrepancy signals an error likely arising from measurement inaccuracies during the fieldwork.To rectify this error, the adjustment process involved distributing the 12-minute shortfall equally across the four internal angles. By...
Design Example: Traverse Angle Computations01:25

Design Example: Traverse Angle Computations

Traverse angle computations are a critical component of surveying, used to compute the internal angles within a closed traverse. A traverse consists of a series of connected lines forming a closed loop, often used for land boundary delineation or mapping. Calculating the internal angles ensures accuracy in the traverse geometry and is essential for checking survey data integrity.The process begins with known azimuths and bearings of the traverse sides. Internal angles at each vertex are...
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method01:24

Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method

The alternative coordinate method, also known as the Shoelace Formula, is a technique for determining the area of a traverse using Cartesian coordinates. This method relies on the sequential arrangement of x and y coordinates for each point of the shape, ensuring accuracy and ease of application.In this approach, each corner's x and y coordinates are listed as fractions, with the x-coordinate as the numerator and the y-coordinate as the denominator. These coordinates are arranged sequentially...
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions01:10

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

When measuring distances in areas with physical obstructions, such as a lake in a field, surveyors must employ techniques to calculate accurate lengths without direct line measurements. One effective method is the offset technique, which allows for precise distance estimation over inaccessible stretches.In this scenario, a surveyor must measure a side of an area that crosses a lake. Since the measuring tape cannot span the lake, the surveyor begins by establishing a baseline that aligns with...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a Measure of Relational Outcomes Between Families and Pediatric Complex Care Programs.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same author

Conceptualizing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Qualitative Exploration of the Family Experience.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same author

The Intra- and Inter-Evaluator Reliability of Coronal Plane Vertebra Displacement Measurements on Spinal Ultrasound Images of Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2025
Same author

Correction: Combining ultrasound and surface topography on curve assessment versus radiographic measurements for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis- a pilot study.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2025
Same author

Answer to the letter to the editor of Q. Hao, et al. concerning "Identifying predictors of brace treatment outcomes for adolescents or adults with idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review" by khodaei, et al. (Eur spine J [2025]: doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08736-w).

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2025
Same author

Combining ultrasound and surface topography on curve assessment versus radiographic measurements for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis- a pilot study.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
05:49

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Published on: February 23, 2024

A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.

Junhua Zhang1, Edmond Lou, Xinling Shi

  • 1Department of Electronic Engineering, Yunnan University, Yunnan, China. jhzhang_2006@yahoo.com.cn

Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques
|February 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new computer-aided method significantly reduces variability in Cobb angle measurements for scoliosis, improving diagnostic reliability for orthopedic surgeons. This tool offers consistent results regardless of observer experience.

More Related Videos

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
07:58

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Published on: July 25, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
05:49

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Published on: February 23, 2024

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
07:58

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Published on: July 25, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Analysis
  • Spine Surgery Technology
  • Radiographic Measurement Techniques

Background:

  • Scoliosis treatment decisions rely on Cobb angle measurements from radiographs.
  • Manual Cobb angle measurement is prone to significant observer error (3-10 degrees).
  • Variability stems from inconsistent end-vertebrae selection and line drawing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computer-aided method for Cobb angle measurement.
  • To reduce measurement variability and improve reliability.
  • To assess the method's sensitivity to observer experience.

Main Methods:

  • A fussy Hough transform technique was employed to automatically detect vertebral endplates.
  • The computer-aided system calculated Cobb angle, upper, and lower end-vertebrae.
  • Three observers tested the method on 84 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis radiographs, analyzing intraobserver and interobserver errors.

Main Results:

  • High intraobserver and interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.9) for Cobb angle.
  • Average errors were <3 degrees for Cobb angle and <0.3 levels for end-vertebrae identification.
  • No significant differences in variability based on curve location, direction, magnitude, or observer experience.

Conclusions:

  • The computer-aided method demonstrably reduces Cobb measurement variability compared to manual methods.
  • This technology enhances the reliability of Cobb angle measurements in clinical settings.
  • The tool assists orthopedic surgeons in making more consistent therapeutic decisions for scoliosis patients.