Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deflection of a Beam01:19

Deflection of a Beam

Accurately determining beam deflection and slope under various loading conditions in structural engineering is crucial for ensuring safety and structural integrity. Singularity functions offer a streamlined approach to analyzing beams, especially when multiple loading functions complicate the bending moment equation.
Singularity functions, described in an earlier lesson, are powerful mathematical tools that represent discontinuities within a function commonly encountered in structural loading...
Design of Prismatic Beams for Bending01:23

Design of Prismatic Beams for Bending

The design of prismatic beams, structural elements with a uniform cross-section, focuses on ensuring safety and structural integrity under load. The design process begins by determining the allowable stress, either from material properties tables, or by dividing the material's ultimate strength by a safety factor. This safety factor is essential for accommodating uncertainties, and varies depending on the material—timber, steel, or concrete—with each having unique strength and stress...
Beams with Symmetric Loadings01:15

Beams with Symmetric Loadings

The moment-area method is an analytical tool used in structural engineering to determine the slope and deflection of beams under various loads. Consider a cantilever with a concentrated load and moment at the free end. The first step is constructing a free-body diagram to calculate the reactions at the fixed end. Next, the bending moment diagram is plotted to visualize how the bending moment varies along the beam's length, focusing on points where the bending moment equals zero.
The M/EI...
Singularity Functions for Bending Moment01:18

Singularity Functions for Bending Moment

Singularity functions simplify the representation of bending moments in beams subjected to discontinuous loading, allowing the use of a single mathematical expression. For a supported beam AB, with uniform loading from its midpoint M to the right side end B, the approach involves conceptual 'cuts' at specific points to determine the bending moment in each segment. By cutting the beam at a point between A and M, the bending moment for the segment before reaching midpoint M is represented using a...
Shear on the Horizontal Face of a Beam Element01:16

Shear on the Horizontal Face of a Beam Element

To understand shear on the flat side of a prismatic beam element, consider the vertical and horizontal shearing forces, and the normal forces, acting on the element. The element's upper (U) and lower (L) sections, which are divided by the beam's neutral axis, are examined. The equilibrium of these forces is determined by applying the equilibrium equation, which helps identify the horizontal shearing force. This force is directly related to the bending moments and the cross-section's first...
Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings01:17

Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings

Analyzing a supported beam under unsymmetrical loadings is essential in structural engineering to understand how beams respond to varied force distributions. This analysis involves calculating the deflection and identifying points where the slope of the beam is zero, which are crucial for ensuring structural stability and functionality.
The first moment-area theorem determines the slope at any point on the beam. This theorem indicates that the change in slope between two points on a beam...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to Letter to the Editor on No Cystometrogram Among Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury Results in Adverse Urinary System Outcomes by N. Yıldız and S. Ötken.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2026
Same author

Cystometry Is Associated With Reduced Overall Mortality in Veterans With Suprasacral Spinal Cord Injury or Disease.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2026
Same author

In-Depth Real-World Evidence: Assembling a Comprehensive Spinal Cord Injury or Disease Veteran Cohort to Advance Understanding of Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2026
Same author

No Cystometrogram Among Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury Results in Adverse Urinary System Outcomes.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2026
Same author

Adhering to Clinical Advice: The Level of Alignment of Care Processes With Global Bladder Guidelines in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injuries or Diseases.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2025
Same author

Proteomics analysis of urine and catheter-associated biofilms in spinal cord injury patients.

American journal of clinical and experimental urology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

Beam shaping using Gaussian beam modes.

John Lavelle1, Créidhe O'Sullivan

  • 1Department of Experimental Physics, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland. john@quasioptics.com

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision
|February 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary

A new Gaussian beam mode set optimization (GBMSO) method designs diffractive optical elements (DOEs) more effectively than standard approaches. This beam shaping technique optimizes multiple beam planes for enhanced optical control.

More Related Videos

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
08:39

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
09:43

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Published on: March 20, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
08:39

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
09:43

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Published on: March 20, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Optics and Photonics
  • Optical Engineering
  • Computational Physics

Background:

  • Diffractive optical elements (DOEs) are crucial for beam shaping.
  • Standard unidirectional design methods have limitations in achieving optimal beam control.
  • Gaussian beam modes offer a versatile basis for complex optical field manipulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel Gaussian Beam Mode Set Optimization (GBMSO) method for designing DOEs.
  • To compare the performance of GBMSO against traditional unidirectional design approaches.
  • To extend the GBMSO method for multi-plane beam shaping applications.

Main Methods:

  • Designing diffractive optical elements (DOEs) by optimizing complex mode coefficient weights of Gaussian beam modes.
  • Utilizing differential evolution as the optimization algorithm for both GBMSO and unidirectional methods.
  • Applying the GBMSO approach to control beam amplitude distribution at multiple planes.

Main Results:

  • The GBMSO approach yielded more optimal solutions compared to the standard unidirectional method for tested beam transformations.
  • The GBMSO method successfully designed DOEs for controlling beam amplitude at multiple planes.
  • Differential evolution effectively optimized Gaussian beam mode coefficients.

Conclusions:

  • The GBMSO method represents a significant advancement in DOE design for beam shaping.
  • GBMSO offers superior performance over conventional techniques, particularly for complex beam manipulations.
  • The extension to multi-plane control broadens the applicability of this beam shaping technique.