Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical considerations in modern human experimentation.

A Steinberg1

  • 1Program of Medical Ethics, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

Cancer Investigation
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pre-Transplant Marital Status and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
Same author

Communicating with children and families about obesity and weight-related topics: a scoping review of best practices.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2016
Same author

Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease following hematopoietic cell transplantation: screening and preventive practice recommendations from CIBMTR and EBMT.

Bone marrow transplantation·2016
Same author

[Jewish medical ethics--introduction].

Harefuah·2014
Same author

White blood cell SPECT during active period of cluster headache and in remission.

European journal of neurology·2011
Same author

Psychoendocrine relationships in pseudocyesis.

Psychosomatic medicine·2010
Same journal

Analysis of Second Primary Tumours in Cutaneous Lymphoma Populations.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

The Heterogeneity of B Cells Potentially Contributes to Metastasis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio, Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Tumor-Associated Macrophages with 3-Year Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Local Stage Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

<i>In Vivo</i> Pharmacokinetics, Bio-Distribution and anti-Tumor Activity of Docetaxel-Loaded Folate Targeted Biocompatible Polymeric Micelles.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: A Concise Review of Current Treatments.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

Adrenal Carcinoma Laterality is of Limited Clinical Significance: A National Perspective.

Cancer investigation·2026
See all related articles

Clinical trials are crucial for medical progress but raise ethical dilemmas. This study examines secular and Jewish principles for human experimentation, focusing on randomized clinical trials and investigator responsibility.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Controlled clinical trials are vital for medical advancement.
  • Human experimentation presents complex moral and ethical challenges.
  • Existing guidelines have not fully resolved ethical controversies in human experimentation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To organize and specify secular and Jewish ethical principles for human experimentation.
  • To evaluate ethical controversies surrounding randomized clinical trials.
  • To emphasize the investigator's role in balancing common good and individual rights.

Main Methods:

  • Methodological organization of ethical principles.
  • Elucidation and evaluation of ethical controversies.
  • Specification of secular and Jewish ethical rules.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchReligious Approach

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified and organized relevant ethical principles.
  • Highlighted the complexities of ethical decision-making in human experimentation.
  • Emphasized the critical role of the physician-investigator.

Conclusions:

  • Society must enforce balanced codes for human experimentation.
  • Investigator conscientiousness is paramount for patient protection.
  • Further evaluation of ethical controversies in randomized clinical trials is necessary.