Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An Adoptive Transfer Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Mice
Published on: June 6, 2025
Biologic agents-a panacea for inflammatory arthritis or not?
J Ninan1, Malcolm D Smith, M Dugar
1Division of Rheumatology, Repatriation General Hospital, Adelaide 5042, Australia.
Biological therapy retention for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients was lower in a clinical setting compared to psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. This contrasts with findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Biological therapies are crucial for managing inflammatory autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
- Understanding treatment retention in real-world clinical settings is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
- Previous studies, often from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), may not fully reflect clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the retention rates of biological therapies across RA, PsA, and AS patient cohorts in a clinical setting.
- To identify potential reasons for treatment discontinuation or switching of biological agents.
- To compare observed retention rates with those reported in existing randomized controlled trials.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of patients receiving biological therapies at a dedicated clinic in an Australian teaching hospital.
- Assessment of treatment continuation, reasons for switching to alternative biological agents, and reasons for cessation.
- Comparison of retention rates between RA, PsA, and AS patient groups and against published RCT data.
Main Results:
- Rheumatoid arthritis patients exhibited lower retention rates on biological therapies compared to patients with psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.
- The retention rate for RA patients in this clinical setting was significantly lower than reported in randomized controlled trials.
- No clear determinants for nonresponse to biological agents were identified, and these therapies demonstrated limited steroid-sparing effects.
Conclusions:
- Clinical retention of biological therapies for RA is suboptimal compared to other spondyloarthropathies and published RCT data.
- The reasons for lower retention in clinical practice require further investigation, as clear predictors of nonresponse were not identified.
- The limited steroid-sparing capacity of these agents may influence treatment decisions and retention.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Chronic Inflammation: Introduction