Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

VVIR or DDD(R): does it matter?

J C Griffin1

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Clinical Cardiology
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dual-chamber pacemakers offer benefits like AV synchrony, crucial for patient well-being and potentially extending longevity. Despite higher costs, their advantages may justify use in specific patient groups.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ventriculocoronary artery bypass (VCAB), a novel approach to myocardial revascularization.

The heart surgery forum·2000
Same author

Catheter reuse.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·1999
Same author

Indications for an atrial defibrillator.

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·1998
Same author

Evaluation of acute dual-chamber pacing with a range of atrioventricular delays on cardiac performance in refractory heart failure.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·1997
Same author

American College of Cardiology report on ECGEXAM.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·1997
Same author

The future role of defibrillators in the management of atrial fibrillation.

Current opinion in cardiology·1997
Same journal

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Interpreting the Association Between Diuretic Intensity Score and Mortality: The Potential Roles of Diuretic Responsiveness and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Therapy.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction-Like Phenotype in Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Insights From the RICCADSA Cohort.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Ethanol Infusion Into the Vein of Marshall for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Efficacy and Technical Limitations.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Methodological Considerations Regarding Diuretic Intensity Score and Mortality in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Inpatient Outcomes and Complications After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Rural Versus Urban Hospitals in the United States.

Clinical cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Healthcare cost-effectiveness drives decisions on advanced pacing systems.
  • Dual-chamber and rate-modulating pacemakers are more complex and costly than single-chamber systems.
  • Lead requirements for dual-chamber systems impact overall system cost and reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the necessity of advanced pacing systems based on efficacy and patient benefit.
  • To weigh the cost-effectiveness of complex pacing systems against their clinical advantages.
  • To explore the impact of preserving atrioventricular (AV) synchrony on patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing systems.
  • Review of existing medical and scientific evidence on pacing system efficacy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of factors influencing pacemaker system cost and reliability.

    • Main Results:

    • AV synchrony is vital at rest, especially for preventing pacemaker syndrome.
    • Evidence supports the benefits of AV synchrony during exercise, irrespective of rate response.
    • Preserving AV synchrony and minimizing ventricular pacing may extend patient longevity.

    Conclusions:

    • The use of more expensive pacing systems should be reserved for cases with proven increased efficacy.
    • The benefits of AV synchrony and potential for extended longevity may justify the increased complexity and cost of dual-chamber systems.
    • Further research is needed to definitively establish the long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness of advanced pacing technologies.