Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

10:34
Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Published on: August 30, 2020
The humanitarians' tragedy: escapable and inescapable cruelties
1Social Science Research Council, New York, NY 10021, USA. dewaal@ssrc.org
Disasters
|February 6, 2010
Summary
Humanitarian work involves unavoidable cruelties, stemming from ethical dilemmas and resource limitations, rather than just technical failures. Understanding these inherent tensions is crucial for the field.
Area of Science:
- Humanitarian Studies
- Ethics in International Relations
- Conflict Resolution
Background:
- Humanitarian aid operations grapple with inherent ethical complexities.
- The professionalization of humanitarianism has reduced technical failures but not all cruelties.
- The 'humanitarian's tragedy' encompasses inescapable cruelties arising from complex circumstances.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the intrinsic elements of cruelty within the humanitarian enterprise.
- To differentiate between escapable and inescapable cruelties in aid delivery.
- To explore the ethical compromises and psychological impacts within humanitarian work.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of ethical dilemmas in humanitarian operations.
- Examination of case studies illustrating rights-based conflicts.
- Conceptual exploration of the 'humanitarian's tragedy' and its components.
Main Results:
- Escapable cruelties, due to technical issues, have decreased with professionalization and technological advancements.
- Inescapable cruelties arise from conflicting rights and the realities of war.
- Individual-level cruelties include failing to maximize good at the margin (triage) and compromising principles.
Conclusions:
- The humanitarian enterprise inherently contains unavoidable cruelties, termed the 'humanitarian's tragedy'.
- These inescapable cruelties stem from ethical conflicts, resource constraints, and the difficult realities of operating in crisis zones.
- Addressing these requires acknowledging the inherent tensions rather than solely focusing on technical improvements.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Social Traps
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Bystander Effect
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.

