Do house officers learn from their mistakes?

A W Wu1, S Folkman, S J McPhee

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California, San Francisco.

JAMA
|April 24, 1991
PubMed

Insights

Medical errors are common among internal medicine house officers, often leading to serious patient harm. Discussing mistakes and accepting responsibility encourages constructive practice changes, while workload and institutional judgment influence resident responses.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Patient Safety
  • Healthcare Quality

Background:

  • Medical errors are an unavoidable aspect of healthcare delivery.
  • Understanding the link between medical mistakes and practice modification is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • Internal medicine house officers are a key demographic for studying error reporting and learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between medical mistakes made by internal medicine house officers and subsequent changes in their medical practice.
  • To identify factors influencing house officers' responses to errors, including discussion with peers and supervisors, and patient/family communication.
  • To explore the impact of perceived workload and institutional culture on error reporting and learning.

Main Methods:

  • Anonymous questionnaire survey administered to 254 internal medicine house officers.
  • 114 house officers (45%) completed the survey detailing their most significant mistake and their response.
  • Data collected on types of mistakes, patient outcomes, and communication patterns.

Main Results:

  • Mistakes encompassed diagnosis (33%), prescribing (29%), evaluation (21%), communication (5%), and procedural complications (11%).
  • Serious adverse patient outcomes occurred in 90% of cases, including death in 31%.
  • Only 54% discussed mistakes with attending physicians; 24% informed patients/families. Accepting responsibility and discussion correlated with constructive practice changes.

Conclusions:

  • House officers who accepted responsibility and discussed their errors were more likely to implement constructive practice changes.
  • Job overload was associated with fewer constructive changes, while a judgmental institutional environment led to defensive changes.
  • Reducing workload, enhancing supervision, and fostering an environment that encourages open discussion of mistakes are vital for medical learning and preventing future errors.

Related Concept Videos

Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report01:25

Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report

A hand-off report, also known as a change-of-shift report, is a crucial nursing process that ensures the smooth transition of patient care responsibilities between nursing staff.
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II01:09

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II

Professional accountability in nursing is a multifaceted concept that encompasses professional ethics, legal standards, and employment expectations. This framework ensures that nurses maintain and elevate the quality of care while upholding the values of their profession. It compels them to treat patients, families, and colleagues with respect, compassion, and integrity.
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide comfort...