Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survey Safety01:28

Survey Safety

258
Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
258
Abdominal Regions and Quadrants01:19

Abdominal Regions and Quadrants

14.4K
To promote clear communication, for instance, about the location of a patient's abdominal pain or a suspicious mass, anatomists and clinicians typically use imaginary lines to categorize the abdominopelvic cavity into either four quadrants or nine regions to identify organs in the cavity.
The simpler quadrants approach, which is more commonly used in medicine, subdivides the cavity with one horizontal and one vertical line that intersects at the patient's umbilicus (navel). The four...
14.4K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.6K
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

5.4K
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R...
5.4K
LC Circuits01:21

LC Circuits

2.9K
An LC circuit consists of an inductor and a capacitor, either in series or parallel. Consider a charged capacitor connected with an inductor in series. Before the switch is closed, all the energy of the circuit is stored in the electric field of the capacitor. When the switch is closed, the capacitor begins to discharge, producing a current in the circuit. The current, in turn, creates a magnetic field in the inductor. Because of the induced emf in the inductor, the current cannot change...
2.9K
Lethal Alleles02:41

Lethal Alleles

17.3K
Agouti: A Lethal Allele
Lucien Cuénot discovered lethal alleles in 1905 while studying the inheritance of coat color in mice. The agouti gene is responsible for the color of the coat in mice. This gene codes for an agouti-signaling protein, which is responsible for melanin distribution in mammals. The wild-type allele gives rise to gray-brown coat color in mice, while the mutant allele gives rise to yellow coat color. In addition to coat color, the agouti gene is associated with the yellow...
17.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

REACT (Real-world Emulated Clinical Trials): A Framework for Drug Repurposing Applied to Osteoporotic Fractures.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2026
Same author

Evaluation of steroids for acute COVID in the prevention of long COVID in children: An EHR and pediatric cohort study from the RECOVER Initiative.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Target Trial Emulation of Vaccine Effectiveness in 5- to 17-years-olds with Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

REACT (Real-world Emulated Clinical Trials): A Framework for Drug Repurposing Applied to Osteoporotic Fractures.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Digital information-seeking behaviors among cancer survivors: associations with sociodemographic determinants, cancer history, and perceived health.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2025
Same author

The PaTH from discovery to implementation: Using a PCORnet® Clinical Research Network's own research to prioritize topics for collaborative health improvement activities.

Learning health systems·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

523

LQAS: User Beware.

Dale A Rhoda1, Soledad A Fernandez, David J Fitch

  • 1College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. rhoda.4@osu.edu

International Journal of Epidemiology
|February 9, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Two Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) methods exist, but one is flawed. This flawed method uses biased study designs, potentially harming vulnerable populations. Researchers must ensure clarity and validity in LQAS studies.

More Related Videos

Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets
07:45

Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets

Published on: February 6, 2014

11.1K
Low-stress Route Learning Using the Lashley III Maze in Mice
09:14

Low-stress Route Learning Using the Lashley III Maze in Mice

Published on: May 22, 2010

18.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

523
Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets
07:45

Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets

Published on: February 6, 2014

11.1K
Low-stress Route Learning Using the Lashley III Maze in Mice
09:14

Low-stress Route Learning Using the Lashley III Maze in Mice

Published on: May 22, 2010

18.2K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Statistics
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) is widely used for public health assessments.
  • Existing LQAS techniques are crucial for evaluating program effectiveness.
  • This study identifies a critical flaw in one of the commonly used LQAS methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between two prevalent Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) methods.
  • To critically evaluate the statistical principles and potential biases of each LQAS method.
  • To highlight the deficiencies in training materials associated with a flawed LQAS approach.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of fundamental Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) design principles.
  • Review of training materials for two distinct LQAS methodologies.
  • Examination of statistical soundness and potential biases in study designs.

Main Results:

  • One Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method is statistically sound and protects vulnerable populations.
  • The second LQAS method, despite simple language, employs biased study designs favoring intervention success.
  • Training materials for the flawed method lack clarity and may mislead users.

Conclusions:

  • A call for higher standards in clarity and face validity for Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) study design, conduct, and reporting.
  • Recommendations for improving the integrity and ethical application of LQAS techniques.
  • Emphasizing the need for robust statistical principles to protect studied populations.