Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Information Processing Approach01:30

Information Processing Approach

The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is also...
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational Modeling Reveals Minimal Vigilance Changes in a Cognitive Monitoring Task.

Computational brain & behaviorยท2026
Same author

Deconstructing the vigilance decrement: Changes in bias, lapse rate, and guess rate, but not sensitivity.

Attention, perception & psychophysicsยท2026
Same author

Spatiotemporal Epidemiological Characteristics of Dengue Fever and Its Relationship with Meteorological Factors - Yunnan Province, China, 2012-2024.

China CDC weeklyยท2026
Same author

Leaving money on the table: As diagnostic aids become more useful, operators use them less efficiently.

Journal of experimental psychology. Appliedยท2025
Same author

Systematically modeling take-over performance: Considering the indirect effect of meteorological visibility mediated by drivers' attention.

Accident; analysis and preventionยท2025
Same author

Author Correction: Characteristics of the first confirmed case of human infection with mpox virus clade Ib in China.

Nature communicationsยท2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive

Jibo He1, Jason S McCarley

  • 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|February 9, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Executive working memory load does not impair visual search perception. This study found that high cognitive load did not degrade visual processing during search tasks, challenging previous assumptions.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • Executive working memory (WM) is known to affect visual search efficiency.
  • The precise mechanisms by which WM load impacts perceptual processing remain unclear.
  • Previous research suggests cognitive load may compromise early visual analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether executive working memory load degrades perceptual processing during visual search.
  • To differentiate between effects on perceptual encoding versus later decision processes.
  • To test the hypothesis that WM load and perceptual difficulty interact nonadditively.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a serial oculomotor search task with varying executive WM load (high vs. low).
  • Visual quality and target-distractor discriminability were manipulated across trials (Experiment 1 & 2).
  • The additive factors method was employed to analyze the interaction between WM load and perceptual difficulty.

Main Results:

  • The effects of executive working memory load and perceptual difficulty on search performance were additive.
  • No nonadditive interaction was observed, contrary to predictions based on degraded perceptual processing.
  • This indicates that executive WM load does not compromise the quality of perceptual analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Executive working memory load does not appear to degrade perceptual analysis during visual search.
  • Findings suggest that WM load may impact later stages of information processing, not initial perception.
  • This research refines our understanding of how cognitive control influences visual attention and search.