Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
[Local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to liver transplantation]
Alexandre Coutinho Teixeira de Freitas1, Josiane Mourão Dias, Mônica Beatriz Parolin
1Departamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, BR. alexandrefreitas@ufpr.br
Objective:
To analyze the results of pre-operative local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who were subjected to liver transplantation.
Methods:
Cadaveric and living-related liver transplants done in cirrotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria were included. The nodules were analyzed according to its number and diameter before and after the institution of the local therapy and on the explant evaluation.
Results:
22 patients with 31 nodules that measured 28.8+/-12 mm in diameter were included. They were subjected to 21 sessions of percutaneous ethanol injection and 29 sessions of transarterial chemoembolization. After the local therapy, 29 nodules that measured 24.6+/-12 mm in diameter were detected. All of them were within the Milan criteria and there was no difference compared to the diameter before the treatment. The patients were subjected to 17 cadaveric and 5 living-related liver transplantations. In six cases the tumors exceeded the Milan criteria on the explant evaluation: 4 due to its number and 2 due to its diameter. Sixteen cases were within the criteria and there were 14 neoplastic nodules with 30+/-14 mm in diameter. In these cases no difference was observed compared to the diameter before and after the local therapy.
Conclusion:
Local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with percutaneous ethanol injection and transarterial chemoembolization partially controlled tumor evolution considering the Milan criteria in patients waiting for liver transplantation. Significant differences were observed in terms of the Milan criteria on pre-operative examination compared to the explant evaluation.
