Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records01:18

Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records

Maintaining nurses' educational and administrative records in healthcare settings, including hospitals and nursing schools, is paramount. Here's a breakdown of the types of academic records mentioned:
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context01:22

Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context

Lev Vygotsky, a pioneering Russian psychologist, developed a theory of cognitive development that centers on the influence of social and cultural factors. Unlike Jean Piaget, who emphasized the child's direct interaction with the physical world as key to development, Vygotsky argued that cognitive growth is an interpersonal process that unfolds within a cultural context. For Vygotsky, a child's learning cannot be separated from their social environment, which includes the values, beliefs, and...
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maximising learning opportunities in handover.

Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition·2009
Same author

How dangerous is food allergy in childhood? The incidence of severe and fatal allergic reactions across the UK and Ireland.

Archives of disease in childhood·2002
Same journal

Implementing a 'special educational needs transition checklist' for young people with complex disability.

Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition·2026
Same journal

Delivery room respiratory care: a quality improvement project to reduce preterm intubations.

Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition·2026
Same journal

Neonate with 'rocker-bottom' feet: what to do when it is not Edwards syndrome.

Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition·2026
Same journal

Breaking the heat: managing steroid refractory warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.

Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition·2026
Same journal

Peripheral precocious puberty due to inadvertent exposure to topical oestradiol gel and review of the literature.

Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition·2026
Same journal

Noisy breathing and faltering growth in a 2-month-old infant: stertor, not stridor.

Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

Evaluation - the educational context.

C F Macdougall1

  • 1Medical Teaching Centre, Warwick Medical School and University Hospital, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. colin.macdougall@warwick.ac.uk

Archives of Disease in Childhood. Education and Practice Edition
|February 11, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper clarifies the principles of effective evaluation, emphasizing the need for clear goals and methods. It guides readers on initiating evaluations and managing externally imposed assessments for meaningful outcomes.

More Related Videos

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Evaluation in medical education varies in scale and complexity, from individual reflection to large-scale governmental reviews.
  • Despite diverse contexts, consistent underlying principles guide effective evaluation practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the concept and importance of evaluation in educational settings.
  • To provide guidance on initiating and conducting evaluations.
  • To address strategies for managing externally imposed evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • The paper employs a conceptual approach, drawing on principles of program evaluation.
  • It synthesizes commonalities across diverse evaluation scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Key to successful evaluation is clarity regarding the evaluator, the subject, and the purpose.
  • Methodology should align with the evaluation's goals to ensure utility and meaning.

Conclusions:

  • Effective evaluation requires a clear understanding of 'what,' 'why,' and 'how.'
  • This framework supports both self-initiated and externally mandated evaluation processes.
  • The principles discussed are applicable across the spectrum of evaluation scales and contexts.