Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating needle exchange: do distributed needles come back?

J Guydish1, G Clark, D Garcia

  • 1Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco 94105.

American Journal of Public Health
|May 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive Cancer Centre Accreditation: Experience and Achievements of a Head Neck Cancer Unit.

Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola·2026
Same author

Laboratory Prognostic Index (LAB-PI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single blood analysis predicts outcomes as good as IPI, NCCN-IPI, and GELTAMO-IPI.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

A comparative STROBE analysis of 10-year oncologic results of SCPL-CHEP and endoscopic CO<sub>2</sub> laser cordectomy for cT2N0M0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2025
Same author

Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Pharmacokinetics of First-Line Antituberculosis Drugs in the HIRIF Trial.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Global Trends of Trait Matching in Avian Frugivory and Its Consequences for the Complementarity and Irreplaceability of Birds.

Ecology letters·2025
Same author

Fungal Planet description sheets: 1697-1780.

Fungal systematics and evolution·2025
Same journal

Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

American journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

Capture-recapture methods evaluated needle exchange programs. Most returned needles came back to their original distribution site, with stationary sites showing higher return rates than mobile ones.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Harm Reduction

Background:

  • Needle exchange programs are crucial for reducing disease transmission among injection drug users.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness and reach of these programs is essential for public health strategies.
  • Understanding needle return patterns can inform program design and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the utility of capture-recapture methods for evaluating needle exchange programs.
  • To determine the return rates of distributed needles and identify factors influencing these rates.

Main Methods:

  • Capture-recapture techniques were applied using color-coded bands on distributed needles.
  • Needles were marked with distribution date and site, and return data were collected over a study period.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis, including chi-squared tests, was used to compare return rates between different site types.

    • Main Results:

    • 61% of distributed needles were returned during the study period.
    • Stationary needle exchange sites had a significantly higher return rate (63%) compared to roving/mobile sites (51%).
    • A high proportion (87%) of returned needles were submitted to their original distribution site.

    Conclusions:

    • Capture-recapture methods provide a viable strategy for evaluating needle exchange program effectiveness.
    • Stationary needle exchange sites appear more effective in retrieving distributed needles than mobile sites.
    • The high rate of return to the original site suggests user engagement and program fidelity.