Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation

Planning for learning involves the development of a teaching plan. Teaching plans are similar to nursing care plans—both follow the steps of the nursing process. Planning in the teaching process involves setting goals and outcomes. Here, goals identify what a patient needs to achieve to understand a healthcare topic better, whereas the outcomes are the action to be performed by the patient to achieve the goal within a timeframe. For example, if the goal is to educate the patient about insulin...
Planning Nursing Care I01:21

Planning Nursing Care I

The planning phase of the nursing process helps nurses set priorities, outline patient-centered goals and expected outcomes, and tailor nursing interventions to align with the aligned care plan. Through the planning phase, the nurse applies critical thinking skills to align and develop interventions according to the patient's needs. It provides continuity of care allowing patients to receive the maximum benefit from treatment. It serves as a pilot plan for allocating individual staff to a...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generation of mixed-valency, modular multispecific antibodies using disulfide-linked Fc-FcγR complexes.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Meditope-Enabled Chimeric Antigen Receptors Facilitate Plug-and-Play Control of T Cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Single-residue engineering of lambda (λ) antibody light chains reduces conformational flexibility and enhances thermal stability.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2025
Same author

MicroRNA-142 improves IL1RAP CAR-T cell activity in acute myeloid leukemia.

Journal of hematology & oncology·2025
Same author

Development of an ultrahigh affinity, trimeric ACE2 biologic as a universal SARS-CoV-2 antagonist.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Functional localization of the human auditory and visual thalamus using a thalamic localizer functional magnetic resonance imaging task.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Lessons learned in systems thinking approach for evaluation planning.

John C Williams1, Julia Costich, William D Hacker

  • 1College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. jcwilliams@uky.edu

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice : JPHMP
|February 13, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systems thinking enhances public health training evaluations by improving workforce competence and public health outcomes. This approach guides practitioners and researchers in assessing program impact effectively.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Systems Research
  • Educational Technology Evaluation

Background:

  • Public health workforce training is crucial for effective public health services.
  • Evaluating the impact of training programs, such as those delivered via learning management systems, is essential.
  • Collaboration between public health departments and academic institutions can enhance evaluation methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the application of systems thinking in planning the evaluation of a learning management system within a public health context.
  • To identify how systems thinking can inform public health practitioners and researchers in evaluating training initiatives.
  • To provide direction for ensuring public health programs achieve desired impacts on workforce competence and public health.

Main Methods:

  • A collaborative approach involving a public health department and academic partners.
  • Focus on planning the evaluation of a learning management system.
  • Application of systems thinking principles to the evaluation planning process.

Main Results:

  • Systems thinking offers a valuable framework for evaluating public health learning management systems.
  • The findings suggest specific directions for improving evaluation strategies.
  • The study highlights the importance of considering interconnectedness in public health interventions.

Conclusions:

  • Systems thinking provides a novel approach for public health evaluation planning.
  • This approach can lead to more effective public health workforce training and improved public health outcomes.
  • Practitioners and researchers should consider integrating systems thinking into their evaluation practices.